ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021
How Should Oncologists Choose an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System for Remote Monitoring of Patients With Cancer?
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05221697 (Effect of an Electronic Alert Management System Using Caregivers' Observations and Machine Learning Algorithm to Reduce the Use of Emergency Department Visits and Unplanned Hospitalizations Among Older People), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of an Electronic Alert Management System Using Caregivers' Observations and Machine Learning Algorithm to Reduce the Use of Emergency Department Visits and Unplanned Hospitalizations Among Older People
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-Analysis of COVID-19 Cluster Events Suggestive of Long-Distance Airborne Transmission/Inhalation.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Implementation of Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Perspectives and Recommendations From Community Oncology Practices (Alliance AFT-39).JCO oncology practice · 2025Article
- Systematic review on the technology's role in supporting lung cancer patients in the treatment journey.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Machine Learning-Based eHealth System to Predict and Reduce Emergency Department Visits and Unscheduled Hospitalizations of Older People Living at Home: Retrospective Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- A sociotechnical framework to assess patient-facing eHealth tools: results of a modified Delphi process.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Psychosocial assessment practices for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a national survey study.Bone marrow transplantation · 2023Article
- Psychosocial Assessment Practices for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A National Survey Study.Research square · 2023Article
- Article
- Electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROMs) in palliative cancer care: a scoping review.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2022Article
- Real-world Implementation of an eHealth System Based on Artificial Intelligence Designed to Predict and Reduce Emergency Department Visits by Older Adults: Pragmatic Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Assessing a New Prescreening Score for the Simplified Evaluation of the Clinical Quality and Relevance of eHealth Apps: Instrument Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Developing a Mobile Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Administration System to Capture Postradiation Toxicity in Oncology: Usability and Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems for symptom monitoring in patients with cancer have shown quality of life and survival benefits in controlled trials. They are beginning to be used in routine oncology practice. Many software developers provide software solutions for clinicians, but how should clinicians decide which system to use? We propose a synthesis of the main questions regarding the effectiveness, safety, and functionality of an ePRO system that a clinician should ask software providers to assist in the selection of a software product in order to obtain the best value tools for their patients and their practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.