Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34499038›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2021

Digital Rehabilitation for Acute Ankle Sprains: Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Fernando D Correia, Maria Molinos, Carlos Neves, Dora Janela, Diana Carvalho, Sara Luis, Gerard E Francisco, Jorge Lains, Virgilio Bento

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04819022 (Digitally Assisted Rehabilitation Programs for Musculoskeletal Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04819022 completednot on this map

Digitally Assisted Rehabilitation Programs for Musculoskeletal Disorders: a Large-scale, Multi-disorder, Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSword Health, SARan2019 to 2024Enrolled10,500ConditionsMusculoskeletal DiseasesArmsAcute and post-acute, Chronic, Post-surgical
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparative Efficacy of Micro-Needle-Knife Therapy and Acupuncture in Acute Ankle Sprains: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Digital Rehabilitation for Elbow Pain Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernando D CorreiaNeurology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8028-926X
Maria MolinosSWORD Health Technologies, Inc, Draper, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9679-4639
Carlos NevesSWORD Health Technologies, Inc, Draper, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8656-8956
Dora JanelaSWORD Health Technologies, Inc, Draper, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8440-2044
Diana CarvalhoSWORD Health Technologies, Inc, Draper, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4273-2416
Sara LuisSWORD Health Technologies, Inc, Draper, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7429-9621
Gerard E FranciscoDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5681-1916
Jorge LainsRovisco Pais Medical and Rehabilitation Centre, Tocha, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8737-7569
Virgilio BentoSWORD Health Technologies, Inc, Draper, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6025-8511
Draper Laboratory · USCentro Hospitalar do Porto · PTMemorial Hermann Institute for Rehabilitation and Research Foundation · USUniversity of Coimbra · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnkle sprains are one of the most prevalent soft-tissue injuries worldwide. Physical therapy, especially progressive exercise, has proven effective in improving function, while preventing recurrence.

objectiveWe aim to present the results of a fully remote and digitally guided rehabilitation program for acute ankle sprains.

methodsWe performed a prospective longitudinal cohort study of individuals eligible for workers' compensation, who were referred for digital rehabilitation therapy for a sprained ankle. Therapeutic exercise sessions were to be performed independently by the patient at home using the biofeedback device provided by SWORD Health. Primary endpoints were the change in self-reported Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-activities of daily living (FAAM-ADL) and FAAM-Sports scores. Participants were assessed at baseline, end of the program, and 6 months after program completion. Secondary outcomes included digital therapy dosage, pain and fatigue during sessions, and satisfaction.

resultsIn total, 93 (89.4%) patients completed the program and 79 (76.0%) were available for follow-up. Changes in the primary outcomes between baseline and the 6-month follow-up were both significant (P<.001) and clinically meaningful: mean difference of -2.72 points (95% CI -3.31 to -2.13) on the NPRS (49.8% reduction), 21.7 points (95% CI 17.13-26.27) on the FAAM-ADL (41.1% increase), and 37.8 points (95% CI 30.45-45.15) on the FAAM-Sports (151.8% increase). Longer waiting periods between the accident date and treatment initiation were found to negatively impact functional status at baseline and at the end of the program, triggering an extension in the program duration. The total training volume (12.5 hours, SD 10.5 hours) was similar to that of other interventions for ankle sprains, but the dosage per week was much higher (2.4 hours per week, SD 0.87 hours per week). The mean patient satisfaction score was 8.8 (SD 1.57) out of 10. Among program completers, 83.9% attained full recovery and were discharged with no residual disability.

conclusionsBeing far less demanding in terms of human resources, the digital program presented constituted a viable, clinically effective, and convenient solution for ankle sprain rehabilitation, particularly during the pandemic. This is the first study presenting a fully remote home-based rehabilitation program for acute ankle sprains, with patients achieving sustained long-term results. This was a prospective cohort study and, as such, did not include a control group, but the results appear comparable to those published for face-to-face interventions.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04819022; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04819022.

Indexed as

acute ankle sprainsanklecohortdigital healthdigital therapyfatiguehome-based digital rehabilitationlongitudinaloutcomepainphysical rehabilitationphysical therapyprospectiverehabilitationsoft tissuespraintherapy

Identifiers

PMID34499038
PMCPMC8517823
OpenAlexW3191626590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.