Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34498812›Full record

ReviewChemSusChem2021

Hydrothermal Degradation of Amino Acids.

Paul Körner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ChemSusChem, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Paul KörnerDBFZ - Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum gemeinnützige GmbH Biorefineries Department, Torgauer Straße 116, 04347, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6412-3742

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research in the framework of abonoCARE® 03WKDI2E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the past years, hydrothermal processes have gathered much attention as promising conversion technologies for especially wet biomass. Amino acids are an integral component of biomass, zoo biomass in particular. However, what happens to them during hydrothermal treatment? Reviewing the available literature going back to the mid of the 20th century revealed an astonishing, but still fragmentary view. In fact, two universal degradation reactions could be identified (i. e., deamination and decarboxylation), competing with each other. Thereby, small structural differences may obviously have huge impacts on the fate of individual amino acids. Nevertheless, the amount of available experimental data is relatively scarce in many cases. In this work, the available knowledge about the degradation of 20 proteinogenic amino acids under hydrothermal conditions was presented and discussed critically. The hydrothermal conversion of proteinaceus biomass as well as the Maillard reaction, both extensively reviewed elsewhere, were only touched on.

Indexed as

deaminationdecarboxylationhigh-pressure chemistryhydrothermal carbonizationproteins

Identifiers

PMID34498812
PMCPMC9292971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.