ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2021
Genetic testing and clinical relevance of patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection in northwestern China.
Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Saw-tooth cardiomyopathy from foetal to neonatal period: a case report and literature review.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- Prevalence and Influence of Genetic Variants on Follow-Up Results in Patients Surviving Thoracic Aortic Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Copy-number variants in the ACMG secondary finding genes: A reporting framework for clinical cytogeneticists.Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
- Article
- Applying multi-omics techniques to the discovery of biomarkers for acute aortic dissection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Genetic testing and clinical relevance of patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection in northwestern China.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection (TAAD) is a life-threatening pathology that remains a challenge worldwide. Up to 40% of TAAD cases are hereditary with complex heterogeneous genetic backgrounds. The purposes of this study were to determine the diagnostic rate of patients with TAAD, investigate the molecular pathologic spectrum of TAAD by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and explore the future preclinical prospects of genetic diagnosis in patients at high -risk of study.
methodsNGS was used to screen 15 genes associated with genetic TAAD in 212 patients from northwestern China. Clinical data of patients were gathered by electrocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and computed tomography.
resultsOf the 212 patients, 67 (31.60%) tested positive for a (likely) pathogenic variant, 42 (19.81%) had a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), and 103 (48.58%) had no variant (likely benign/benign/negative). A total of 135 reportable variants were detected in our test, among which 77 (57.04%) are first reported in this paper. A genotype-phenotype correlation of FBN1 was assessed, and the data showed that the patients with truncating and splicing mutations are more prone to developing severe aortic dissection than those with missense mutations, especially frameshift mutations (82.76% vs. 42.86%). In this study, 43 (20.28%) patients had a family history of sudden death or TAAD, whereas 132 (62.26%) did not (the remaining 37 were not available), and the positive rate of genetic testing was higher in TAAD patients with family history than in those without (76.74% vs. 18.94%).
conclusionOur study concludes that genetic variation is an important consideration in the risk stratification of individualized prediction and disease diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.