Trial reportThe oncologist2021
A Long-Term Extension Study of Bevacizumab in Patients With Solid Tumors.
Trial report in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01588184 (A Single Arm, Open Label Multicentre Extension Study of Bevacizumab in Patients With Solid Tumours on Study Treatment With Bevacizumab, at the End of A F. Hoffmann-La Roche and/or Genentech Sponsored Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Single Arm, Open Label Multicentre Extension Study of Bevacizumab in Patients With Solid Tumours on Study Treatment With Bevacizumab, at the End of A F. Hoffmann-La Roche and/or Genentech Sponsored Study
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy and adverse events of bevacizumab combined with temozolomide in the treatment of glioma: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Bevacizumab: The future of chronic subdural hematoma.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026Review
- Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Bevacizumab Plus Sintilimab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Economic evaluation of three domestic bevacizumab biosimilars and the original bevacizumab for treating nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer in china: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2025Article
- Current Landscape of Cancer Immunotherapy: Harnessing the Immune Arsenal to Overcome Immune Evasion.Biology · 2024Review
- Potential role of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in the treatment of cancer: A contemporary nursing practice.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Sudden aortic dissection: A cautionary tale for the unexplained back pain during bevacizumab treatment.Radiology case reports · 2023Article
- Targeting angiogenesis in oncology, ophthalmology and beyond.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2023Review
- Unexpected "Lazarus response" to single-agent bevacizumab in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023Article
- Article
- Clinical progress of anti-angiogenic targeted therapy and combination therapy for gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Targeting the tumor stroma for cancer therapy.Molecular cancer · 2022Review
- Review
- Emerging Trends in Immunotherapy for Cancer.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBevacizumab has been studied in numerous clinical trials in multiple types of cancer; however, patients may receive bevacizumab over an extended period of time. This study assessed the long-term safety and tolerability of bevacizumab among patients with solid tumors. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients enrolled in a Roche/Genentech-sponsored trial who had derived benefit from bevacizumab therapy as monotherapy or in combination with anticancer drugs were eligible for continuation of bevacizumab in this long-term extension (LTE) study. The primary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events (AEs) of Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) grade ≥3 related to bevacizumab treatment, serious AEs (SAEs), and deaths.
resultsNinety-five patients with the following cancer types were enrolled in the LTE: ovarian cancer or peritoneal carcinoma (n = 41), non-small cell lung cancer (n = 16), glioblastoma multiforme (n = 14), breast cancer (n = 11), colorectal cancer (n = 7), or renal cell carcinoma (n = 6). The median (range) duration of bevacizumab treatment was 15.6 (0.0-81.0) months during the LTE and 57.5 (16.4-134.9) months overall (parent trial + LTE), with three patients receiving bevacizumab for >10 years. Overall, 17 patients (17.9%) experienced SAEs, and 21 (22.1%) had a bevacizumab-related AE of CTCAE grade ≥3 (proteinuria and hypertension were the most common). Four patients died: three from disease progression and one from an AE considered unrelated to bevacizumab.
conclusionThe safety outcomes observed support the tolerability of long-term bevacizumab in patients with various solid tumors, with a median extended treatment duration of almost 5 years overall and >10 years in some individual patients. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01588184. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In this long-term extension study of patients with solid tumors, the median duration of bevacizumab treatment (including parent trials) was just under 5 years, with a long-term exposure in some patients of 7 to >10 years. Grade ≥3 adverse events related to bevacizumab were consistent with the established safety profile, with proteinuria and hypertension being the most common. Patients received bevacizumab over an extended period of time (beyond the length of most clinical trials), and the overall safety outcomes observed support the tolerability of long-term bevacizumab treatment in patients with solid tumors, with clinical benefit achieved over an extended period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.