Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34498223›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2022

The historical evolution of the fornix and its terminology: a review.

Eray Dogan, Abuzer Gungor, Fikret Dogulu, Uğur Türe

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Eray DoganDepartment of Neurosurgery, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Abuzer GungorDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yeditepe University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fikret DoguluDepartment of Neurosurgery, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Uğur TüreDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yeditepe University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. drture@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2499-7525
Yeditepe University · TRGazi University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The historical evolution of the fornix has not been sufficiently reviewed in the literature. In this article, we follow this evolution from the first mention of the fornix in animal dissections of the second century AD, to the legalization of cadaver dissection in the 1300 s, to the introduction of neural staining techniques and the microscope in the seventeenth century, to today. We summarize the focus of fornix studies on memory to reveal its relationship with the hippocampus. We then cover the detection of the fornix and its neural connections noninvasively with the advancement of radiological imaging techniques. Finally, we discuss the prominence of the fornix as a target for deep brain stimulation in Alzheimer's disease and post-traumatic brain injury memory disorders.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDeep Brain StimulationAnimalsFornix, BrainHippocampusHumansAnatomical terminologyFornixHistory of neurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID34498223
OpenAlexW3196550091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.