Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34498174›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2022

Robotic mesh-supported pectopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: expanding the options of pelvic floor repair.

Dimitrios Bolovis, Wolfgang Hitzl, Cosima Brucker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Is occult stress urinary incontinence truly "occult"?Gynecology and pelvic medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Scoping Review.International urogynecology journal · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dimitrios BolovisParacelsus Medical University, University Women's Hospital, Klinikum Nuernberg, Nuremberg, Germany. dimitrios.bolovis@klinikum-nuernberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4935-2328
Wolfgang HitzlDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Cosima BruckerParacelsus Medical University, University Women's Hospital, Klinikum Nuernberg, Nuremberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse affects 30-50% of the female population. For definitive treatment surgery is unavoidable. Sacrocolpopexy has been the gold standard for anatomical correction of pelvic organ prolapse since the 1990s. Recently, pectopexy has been introduced as a new surgical procedure to correct apical prolapse. We have translated the laparoscopic pectopexy into a robotic procedure. The charts of the first 30 consecutive patients who underwent robotic pectopexy at the department for robotic and pelvic floor surgery were reviewed. All patients were analyzed for estimated blood loss, operation time, as well as complications. Treatment success was evaluated after 3-6 months using a composite endpoint including anatomical and subjective components. Of the 30 patients analyzed, 18 underwent hysteropectopexy (n = 18), 6 patients underwent vaginopectopexy and 6 patients underwent cervicopectopexy. Additional procedures were performed in 14 patients, and this influenced operation time and intraoperative blood loss. No intraoperative complications were noted and no conversions were necessary. Treatment success according to the primary composite endpoint was achieved in 30 (100%) patients. Furthermore, neither de novo urgency nor obstructive bowel symptoms were noted in any of the patients treated with robotic pectopexy. Similar to SCP, pectopexy is designed for prolapse repair. The robotic technique for pectopexy capitalizes on the advantages of robotic surgery as compared to conventional laparoscopy since it allows for anatomical preparation and simplification of applying sutures and mesh material, reducing operating time and minimizing surgical trauma. The technique is safe, and anatomical outcomes are excellent.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPelvic Organ ProlapseRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsPelvic FloorSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomePectopexyPelvic floor disorderPelvic organ prolapseRoboticSurgerySurgical mesh

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.