Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34498153›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research and treatment2021

Patient preferences and adherence to adjuvant GnRH analogs among premenopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer.

Jasmine S Sukumar, Dionisia Quiroga, Mahmoud Kassem, Michael Grimm, Namrata Vilas Shinde, Leslie Appiah, Marilly Palettas, Julie Stephens, Margaret E Gatti-Mays, Ashley Pariser and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The role of exercise in aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The crosstalk between ubiquitination and endocrine therapy.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jasmine S SukumarDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1204A Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Dr., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Dionisia QuirogaDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1204A Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Dr., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Mahmoud KassemDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1204A Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Dr., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Michael GrimmDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1204A Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Dr., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Namrata Vilas ShindeDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1204A Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Dr., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Leslie AppiahDivision of Academic Specialists in Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anshultz, Aurora, CO, USA.
Marilly PalettasCenter for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Julie StephensCenter for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Margaret E Gatti-MaysDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1204A Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Dr., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Ashley PariserDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1204A Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Dr., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Mathew CherianDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1204A Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Dr., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Daniel G StoverDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1204A Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Dr., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Nicole WilliamsDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1204A Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Dr., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Jeffrey Van DeusenDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1204A Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Dr., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Robert WesolowskiDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1204A Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Dr., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Maryam LustbergDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1204A Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Dr., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Bhuvaneswari RamaswamyDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1204A Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Dr., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Sagar SardesaiDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1204A Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Dr., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. Sagar.Sardesai@osumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2688-0486
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
The OSU Center for Clinical and Translational Science: Advancing Today's Discoveries to Improve HealthUL1TR002733 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RINGEL, MATTHEW D · 2018 to 2022
$28.9M
Training Hematology and Oncology Fellows in Clinical ResearchT32CA247815 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI VERSCHRAEGEN, CLAIRE F., WESOLOWSKI, ROBERT · 2020 to 2024
$862k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002733NCI NIH HHS T32 CA247815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdjuvant ovarian function suppression (OFS) in premenopausal hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer (BC) improves survival. Adherence to adjuvant gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs (GnRHa) remains a challenge and is associated with toxicities and inconvenient parenteral administration. The goal of this study was to describe real-world adherence patterns and patient preferences surrounding adjuvant GnRHa.

methodsWe analyzed the medical records of premenopausal women with non-metastatic HR positive BC from January 2000 to December 2017; participants received adjuvant monthly goserelin or leuprolide at The Ohio State University. Data collected included demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, and OFS adherence/side effects. We defined non-adherence as discontinuation of GnRHa within 3 years for a reason other than switching to an alternate OFS, delay > 7 days from a dose, or a missed dose. Chi-square tests assessed associations between clinical characteristics and outcomes.

resultsA total of 325 patients met eligibility. Of these, 119 (37%) patients were non-adherent to GnRHa; 137 (42%) underwent elective bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy after initial GnRHa. Those opting for surgery reported significantly more hot flashes (74% vs 48%, p < 0.001), arthralgias (46% vs 30%, p = 0.003), and vaginal dryness (37% vs 21%, p = 0.001) compared with patients remaining on GnRHa.

conclusionNon-adherence to adjuvant GnRHa occurred in over a third of patients and almost half the patients initiating GnRHa underwent subsequent surgical ablation. These high frequencies highlight real-world patterns of OFS. Additionally, treatment toxicities may impact personal preference of OFS modality. Personalized practices to target predictors of adjuvant GnRHa non-adherence are critical to optimize symptoms, adherence, and survivorship.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneGoserelinHumansPatient PreferencePremenopauseTamoxifenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneGoserelinTamoxifenBreast cancerEndocrine therapyGnRHOvarian ablationOvarian suppressionPremenopausal

Identifiers

PMID34498153
PMCPMC8560558
OpenAlexW3198893692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.