Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2021
Maximal strength training-induced increase in efferent neural drive is not reflected in relative protein expression of SERCA.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of 8 Weeks of Moderate- or High-Volume Strength Training on Sarcoplasmic Reticulum CaScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2025Trial
- Aerobic high-intensity interval training and maximal strength training in patients with unspecific musculoskeletal disorders improve V̇OEuropean journal of sport science · 2024Trial
- Effects of electromyostimulation on sarcolipin and CaBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Responder signatures and predictors of upper- and lower-limb power responsiveness to maximal strength versus plyometric dry-land training in swimmers.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Combined effects of blood flow restriction training and nutritional intervention on muscle adaptations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Heavy Strength Training in Older Adults: Implications for Health, Disease and Physical Performance.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Review
- Maximal intended velocity enhances strength training-induced neuromuscular stimulation in older adults.European journal of applied physiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMaximal strength training (MST), performed with heavy loads (~ 90% of one repetition maximum; 1RM) and few repetitions, yields large improvements in efferent neural drive, skeletal muscle force production, and skeletal muscle efficiency. However, it is elusive whether neural adaptations following such high intensity strength training may be accompanied by alterations in energy-demanding muscular factors.
methodsSixteen healthy young males (24 ± 4 years) were randomized to MST 3 times per week for 8 weeks (n = 8), or a control group (CG; n = 8). Measurements included 1RM and rate of force development (RFD), and evoked potentials recordings (V-wave and H-reflex normalized to M-wave (M) in the soleus muscle) applied to assess efferent neural drive to maximally contracting skeletal muscle. Biopsies were obtained from vastus lateralis and analyzed by western blots and real-time PCR to investigate the relative protein expression and mRNA expression of Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca
resultsSignificant improvements in 1RM (17 ± 9%; p < 0.001) and early (0-100 ms), late (0-200 ms) and maximal RFD (31-53%; p < 0.01) were observed after MST, accompanied by increased maximal V
conclusionMST increased efferent neural drive to maximally contracting skeletal muscle, causing improved force production. No change was observed in SERCA expression, indicating that responses to high intensity strength training may predominantly be governed by neural adaptations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.