Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34498108›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2022

Smoldering lesions in MS: if you like it then you should put a rim on it.

Catarina Pinto, Melissa Cambron, Adrienn Dobai, Eva Vanheule, Jan W Casselman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Emerging imaging markers in radiologically isolated syndrome: implications for earlier treatment initiation.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predictive MRI Biomarkers in MS-A Critical Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Catarina PintoNeuroradiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Melissa CambronDepartment of Neurology, AZ St. Jan Brugge-Oostende av, Campus Brugge, Ruddershove 10, B-8000, Brugge, Belgium.
Adrienn DobaiDepartment of Oral Diagnostics, Faculty of Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi u. 47, Budapest, 1088, Hungary.
Eva VanheuleDepartment of Radiology, AZ St. Jan Brugge-Oostende av, Campus Brugge, Ruddershove 10, B-8000, Brugge, Belgium.
Jan W CasselmanDepartment of Radiology, AZ St. Jan Brugge-Oostende av, Campus Brugge, Ruddershove 10, B-8000, Brugge, Belgium. jan.casselman@azsintjan.be.
AZ Sint-Jan · BEGhent University · BESemmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn multiple sclerosis (MS), chronic active/smoldering white matter lesions presenting with hypointense rims on susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) of the brain have been recognized as an important radiological feature. The aim of this work was to study the prevalence of paramagnetic rim lesions (RLs) in MS patients in a clinical setting and to assess differences in demographic and clinical variables regarding the presence of RLs.

methodsAll 3 T brain magnetic resonance (MR) studies performed in MS patients between July 2020 and January 2021 were reviewed. In all patients, RLs were assessed on three-dimensional (3D) SWI images and the T2 FLAIR lesion load volume was assessed. Demographic, laboratory (oligoclonal bands in CSF), and clinical data, including functional status with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), were retrieved from the clinical files.

resultsOf the 192 patients, 113 (59%) presented with at least 1 RL. In the RL-positive group, the mean RL count was 4.81 ranging from 1 to 37. There was no significant difference in the number of RLs between the different types of MS (p = 0.858). Regarding the presence of RLs, there were no significant differences based on gender (p = 0.083), disease duration (p = 0.520), treatment regime (p = 0.326), EDSS score (p = 0.103), and the associated T2 FLAIR lesion load volume.

conclusionSWI RLs were frequently detected in our cohort regardless of the MS type, T2 FLAIR lesion load volume, demographic features, disease duration, or clinical score. Our results suggest that RLs are not associated with more severe forms of the disease. Today, RLs can be seen on 3 T 3D SWI, although this is not a clinical standard sequence yet. Therefore, it should be considered an additional helpful MR sequence in the diagnostic workup of MS, although more studies are warranted to establish the role of RLs as prognostic markers.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisBrainCohort StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMRMultiple sclerosisRing lesionsSWI

Identifiers

PMID34498108
OpenAlexW3198347126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.