Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34498106›Full record

ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2021

Anodic and cathodic biofilms coupled with electricity generation in single-chamber microbial fuel cell using activated sludge.

Ebtehag A E Sakr, Dena Z Khater, K M El-Khatib

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ebtehag A E SakrBotany Department, Faculty of Women for Arts, Science and Education, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. Ebtehag.Abdelfattah@women.asu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6657-7553
Dena Z KhaterChemical Engineering and Pilot Plant Department, National Research Centre (NRC), El Buhouth St., 12622-Dokki, Cairo, Egypt.
K M El-KhatibChemical Engineering and Pilot Plant Department, National Research Centre (NRC), El Buhouth St., 12622-Dokki, Cairo, Egypt.
National Research Centre · EGAin Shams University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is used to remove organic pollutants while generating electricity. Biocathode plays as an efficient electrocatalyst for accelerating the Oxidation Reduction Reaction (ORR) of oxygen in MFC. This study integrated biocathode into a single-chamber microbial fuel cell (BSCMFC) to produce electricity from an organic substrate using aerobic activated sludge to gain more insights into anodic and cathodic biofilms. The maximum power density, current density, chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal, and coulombic efficiency were 0.593 W m

Indexed as

Bioelectric Energy SourcesBiofilmsElectricityElectrodesSewageBiological Oxygen Demand AnalysisSewageActivated sludgeBiocathodeBiofilm viabilityPower density

Identifiers

PMID34498106
OpenAlexW3198070420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.