Looking for clinician involvement under the wrong lamp post: The need for collaboration measures.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Evaluating the translation of implementation science to clinical artificial intelligence: a bibliometric study of qualitative research.Frontiers in health services · 2023
   Review
2. Response to: Looking for clinician involvement under the wrong lamp post: the need for collaboration measures.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Response to: Looking for clinician involvement under the wrong lamp post: the need for collaboration measures.2021
• Comment on
  Clinician involvement in research on machine learning-based predictive clinical decision support for the hospital setting: A scoping review.2021

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.