Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34498008›Full record

ArticleRadiology. Cardiothoracic imaging2021

Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance of Aortic Valve Calcium Score with Cardiac CT for Aortic Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis.

Tom Kai Ming Wang, Scott D Flamm, Paul Schoenhagen, Brian P Griffin, L Leonardo Rodriguez, Richard A Grimm, Bo Xu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tom Kai Ming WangSection of Cardiovascular Imaging, Robert and Suzanne Tomsich Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195 (T.K.M.W., B.P.G., L.L.R., R.A.G., B.X.); and Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (T.K.M.W., S.D.G., P.S., L.L.R., R.A.G., B.X.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5570-9402
Scott D FlammSection of Cardiovascular Imaging, Robert and Suzanne Tomsich Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195 (T.K.M.W., B.P.G., L.L.R., R.A.G., B.X.); and Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (T.K.M.W., S.D.G., P.S., L.L.R., R.A.G., B.X.).ORCID 0000-0002-4317-9077
Paul SchoenhagenSection of Cardiovascular Imaging, Robert and Suzanne Tomsich Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195 (T.K.M.W., B.P.G., L.L.R., R.A.G., B.X.); and Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (T.K.M.W., S.D.G., P.S., L.L.R., R.A.G., B.X.).ORCID 0000-0002-7751-5243
Brian P GriffinSection of Cardiovascular Imaging, Robert and Suzanne Tomsich Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195 (T.K.M.W., B.P.G., L.L.R., R.A.G., B.X.); and Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (T.K.M.W., S.D.G., P.S., L.L.R., R.A.G., B.X.).
L Leonardo RodriguezSection of Cardiovascular Imaging, Robert and Suzanne Tomsich Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195 (T.K.M.W., B.P.G., L.L.R., R.A.G., B.X.); and Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (T.K.M.W., S.D.G., P.S., L.L.R., R.A.G., B.X.).ORCID 0000-0003-1159-7933
Richard A GrimmSection of Cardiovascular Imaging, Robert and Suzanne Tomsich Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195 (T.K.M.W., B.P.G., L.L.R., R.A.G., B.X.); and Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (T.K.M.W., S.D.G., P.S., L.L.R., R.A.G., B.X.).
Bo XuSection of Cardiovascular Imaging, Robert and Suzanne Tomsich Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195 (T.K.M.W., B.P.G., L.L.R., R.A.G., B.X.); and Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (T.K.M.W., S.D.G., P.S., L.L.R., R.A.G., B.X.).ORCID 0000-0002-2985-7468
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of the aortic valve calcium score (AVCS) with the Agatston method using CT in aortic stenosis (AS) and to assess mean AVCS according to AS severity. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from January 1, 1980, to December 31, 2020, for studies reporting sensitivity and specificity of AVCS using CT for severe AS, mean AVCS in severe and nonsevere AS, and/or hazard ratios for all-cause mortality in AS. Data were pooled using random effect models and meta-analysis software.

resultsTwelve studies (six diagnostic, three prognostic, and 10 reporting mean AVCS by AS severity) were included for analysis. A total of 4101 patients (2255 with severe AS) were described in these 12 studies. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 82% (95% CI: 80, 84) and 78% (95% CI: 75, 81), respectively. Pooled mean AVCS were 3219 (95% CI: 2795, 3643) for severe AS, compared with 1252 (95% CI: 863, 1640) for nonsevere AS, 1808 (95% CI: 1163, 2452) for moderate AS, and 584 (95% CI: 309, 859) for mild AS. Pooled hazard ratio for AVCS as a binary threshold to predict mortality was 2.11 (95% CI: 1.11, 4.12).

conclusionAVCS had moderate to high sensitivity and specificity for identifying severe AS and was also a useful prognostic imaging marker in AS. Mean AVCS categorized by AS severity may help guide clinical management.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveCTMeta-AnalysisValves

Identifiers

PMID34498008
PMCPMC8415142
OpenAlexW3194898206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.