ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Prognostic Relevance of 18F-FDG-PET/CT-Guided Target Volume Delineation in Loco-Regionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinomas: A Comparative Study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- DWI-guided DP-IMRT and conventional MRI-based IMRT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Review
- Prognostic potential of a voxelwise invasion risk map of nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on a coordinate system of the nasopharynx.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAn optimal approach to define tumor volume in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) remains unclear. This retrospective study aimed at comparing the outcomes and toxicities of different FDG-PET/CT-guided techniques for primary tumor volume delineation in locoregionally advanced NPC.
methodsFrom August 2015 to February 2018, 292 patients with stage III-IVB NPC received FDG-PET/CT-guided IMRT. Three PET/CT-based techniques were used to determine the gross tumor volume (GTV) as follows: visual criteria (group A; n = 98), a standard uptake value (SUV) threshold of 2.5 (group B; n = 95), and a threshold of 50% maximal intensity (group C, n = 99) combined with a dose-painting technique.
resultsIn groups A, B, and C, the 5-year LRFS rates were 89.4%, 90.0%, and 97.8%, respectively (p = 0.043). The 5-year DMFS rates were 75.1%, 76.0%, and 87.7%, respectively (p = 0.043). The 5-year DFS rates were 70.9%, 70.3%, and 82.2%, respectively (p = 0.048). The 5-year OS rates were 73.5%, 73.9%, and 84.9%, respectively (p = 0.038). Group C showed significantly higher 5-year LRFS, LRRFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS than those in groups A and B (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the three study groups in the cumulative incidences of grade 3-4 acute and late toxicities. Multivariate analyses showed that the PET/CT-guided technique for target volume delineation was an independent prognostic factor for 5-year LRFS, DFS, DMFS, and OS (p = 0.039, p = 0.030, p = 0.035 and p = 0.028, respectively), and was marginally significant in predicting LRRFS (p = 0.080).
conclusionsThe 50% SUVmax threshold regimen for GTV delineation with dose-painting appeared to be superior to the visual criteria or SUV2.5 threshold in locoregionally advanced NPC, and there was no increased toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.