ArticleJournal of translational internal medicine2021
Comparing the Performance of the ABC, AIMS65, GBS, and pRS Scores in Predicting 90-day Mortality Or Rebleeding Among Emergency Department Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Prospective Multicenter Study.
Article in Journal of translational internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comparison of the ABC and AIMS65 Scores in Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Characteristics, Risk Stratification, and Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Therapy.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Investigation of the relationship between shock index and BUN/Albumin ratio with clinical outcomes in patients presenting to the emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of the ABC score in predicting 30-day mortality in upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding at Muhimbili National Hospital, Tanzania: a single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Predictive Value of the Combination of Lactate and qSOFA Score for Clinical Outcomes in Cirrhotic Patients with Esophagogastric Variceal Bleeding.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting Mortality in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Machine Learning Models Versus Conventional Clinical Risk Scores.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting mortality and readmission in UGIB: a comparative study of rockall, glasgow-blatchford, and AIMS65 scores.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Observational
- ABC score is a better predictor for 30-day mortality in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective single-center study.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Comparison of Canada-United Kingdom-Australia (CANUKA) scores of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding presenting to the emergency department with other gastrointestinal bleeding scores.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Research progress on nutritional support for patients with liver cirrhosis complicated by upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Development, validation, and web deployment of a rebleeding risk prediction model for acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a Chinese population.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison and validation of several scoring systems for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Validating the CHAMPS Score: A Novel and Reliable Prognostic Score of Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Interpretations of the Role of Plasma Albumin in Prognostic Indices: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: A review.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2023Article
- A Nomogram Model for Prediction of Mortality Risk of Patients with Dangerous Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Two-center Retrospective Study.Current medical science · 2023Article
- Use of the AIMS65 and pre-endoscopy Rockall scores in the prediction of mortality in patients with the upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022Article
- Nomogram for predicting rebleeding after initial endoscopic epinephrine injection monotherapy hemostasis in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Validation of the new ABC score for predicting 30-day mortality in gastrointestinal bleeding.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Peri-Ulcerative Mucosal Inflammation Appearance is an Independent Risk Factor for 30-Day Rebleeding in Patients with Gastric Ulcer Bleeding: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesAcute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common problem that can cause significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare the performance of the ABC score (ABC), the AIMS65 score (AIMS65), the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), and the pre-endoscopic Rockall score (pRS) in predicting 90-day mortality or rebleeding among patients with acute UGIB.
methodsThis was a prospective multicenter study conducted at 20 tertiary hospitals in China. Data were collected between June 30, 2020 and February 10, 2021. An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis was used to compare the performance of the four scores in predicting 90-day mortality or rebleeding.
resultsAmong the 1072 patients included during the study period, the overall 90-day mortality rate was 10.91% (117/1072) and the rebleeding rate was 12.03% (129/1072). In predicting 90-day mortality, the ABC and pRS scores performed better with an AUC of 0.722 (95% CI 0.675-0.768;
conclusionIn patients with acute UGIB, ABC and pRS performed better than AIMS-65 and GBS in predicting 90-day mortality. The performance of each score is not satisfactory in predicting rebleeding, however. Newer predictive models are needed to predict rebleeding after UGIB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.