Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34497519›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2021

Case Report: Rehabilitation After Platelet-Rich Growth Factors' Intra-Articular Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: Two Case Reports of a Home-Based Protocol.

Francesco Negrini, Francesco De Lucia, Stefano Negrini, Davide Tornese, Francesca Facchini, Michele Vecchio, Laura de Girolamo

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco NegriniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Francesco De LuciaDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Stefano NegriniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Davide TorneseServizio di Fisioterapia, Synlab CAM, Monza, Italy.
Francesca FacchiniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Michele VecchioDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Laura de GirolamoIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITUniversity of Catania · ITSynlab Czech (Czechia) · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a chronic progressive disease that can cause pain, functional impairment, and ultimately disability. A novel and promising therapeutic approach to KOA is the so-called regenerative medicine, a set of procedures designed to harness tissue regenerative capacity and optimize functional recovery. Increasing evidence points out that platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intra-articular injections can decrease pain and improve functional abilities in KOA patients. In the present case reports, we analyze two patients who were treated with PRP injections coupled with a posttreatment home-based rehabilitation program. The two patients were selected to represent two different populations: patient 1 was an 85-year-old with severe impairment of functional abilities, while patient 2 was a younger (59 years old) and more active patient. The protocol consisted in a series of exercise to be performed at home, during the five days following PRP injection for two consecutive weeks (10 days in total). The exercises were designed to reduce the inflammation after the injection, enhance the proprioceptive control of the treated lower limb, and strengthen hip and knee flexors and extensors, mainly by isometric work. Results were evaluated at two time points: before and 2 months after the first PRP injection. The outcomes considered were as follows: visual analog scale for pain, EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire, Tegner Activity Scale for functioning, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Both patients did not report any side effects from the treatment. Improvement in patient 1 was drastic at the two months follow-up as far as pain and functional abilities are concerned. Patient 2's improvement was less evident, probably due to the higher starting point in both pain and functionality. Overall, the developed program seemed safe and was tolerated by the patients analyzed in the study, who performed it with good compliance.

Indexed as

exercisefunctionalityknee OAphysiotherapyplatelet-rich plasma

Identifiers

PMID34497519
PMCPMC8419220
OpenAlexW3193622071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.