Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34497123›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Fast and nonuniform dynamics of perisaccadic vision in the central fovea.

Janis Intoy, Naghmeh Mostofi, Michele Rucci

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Looking for Details: Fine-Grained Visual Search at the Foveal Scale.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Spatial and Temporal Factors Influencing Fixational Saccades.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Pre-microsaccadic Modulation in Foveal V1: Enhancement in the Current and Future Stimulus Locations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Stimulus representations in visual cortex shaped by spatial attention and microsaccades.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Eye Tracking in Optometry: A Systematic Review.Journal of eye movement research · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janis IntoyDepartment of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627; jintoy@bu.edu mrucci@ur.rochester.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6024-1661
Naghmeh MostofiDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215.
Michele RucciDepartment of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627; jintoy@bu.edu mrucci@ur.rochester.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3066-1964
Boston University · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Function of Fixational Instability During Natural ViewingR01EY018363 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI RUCCI, MICHELE · 2007 to 2025
$7.8M
Function of Fixational Eye Movements for Fine Depth PerceptionF31EY029565 · NEI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI INTOY, JANIS · 2018 to 2020
$135k
NEI NIH HHS F31 EY029565NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans use rapid eye movements (saccades) to inspect stimuli with the foveola, the region of the retina where receptors are most densely packed. It is well established that visual sensitivity is generally attenuated during these movements, a phenomenon known as saccadic suppression. This effect is commonly studied with large, often peripheral, stimuli presented during instructed saccades. However, little is known about how saccades modulate the foveola and how the resulting dynamics unfold during natural visual exploration. Here we measured the foveal dynamics of saccadic suppression in a naturalistic high-acuity task, a task designed after primates' social grooming, which-like most explorations of fine patterns-primarily elicits minute saccades (microsaccades). Leveraging on recent advances in gaze-contingent display control, we were able to systematically map the perisaccadic time course of sensitivity across the foveola. We show that contrast sensitivity is not uniform across this region and that both the extent and dynamics of saccadic suppression vary within the foveola. Suppression is stronger and faster in the most central portion, where sensitivity is generally higher and selectively rebounds at the onset of a new fixation. These results shed light on the modulations experienced by foveal vision during the saccade-fixation cycle and explain some of the benefits of microsaccades.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleFixation, OcularFovea CentralisHumansMaleMovementPhotic StimulationSaccadesVision, OcularVisual AcuityVisual Perceptionfoveamicrosaccadessaccadic suppression

Identifiers

PMID34497123
PMCPMC8449317
OpenAlexW3197635061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.