Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34496978›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2021

Aligning implementation science with improvement practice: a call to action.

Jennifer Leeman, Catherine Rohweder, Matthew Lee, Alison Brenner, Andrea Dwyer, Linda K Ko, Meghan C O'Leary, Grace Ryan, Thuy Vu, Shoba Ramanadhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. An introduction to implementation science in rehabilitation medicine.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jennifer LeemanSchool of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7460, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. jleeman@email.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3130-8297
Catherine RohwederCenter for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7424, Carrboro, NC, 27510, USA.
Matthew LeeDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Ave, 8th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Alison BrennerDepartment of General Medicine & Clinical Epidemiology, UNC School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7293, Carrboro, NC, 27510, USA.
Andrea DwyerUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, 13001 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Linda K KoDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Meghan C O'LearyDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7400, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Grace RyanThe University of Iowa, 145 N. Riverside Drive, N475 CPHB, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Thuy VuDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Shoba RamanadhanDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Funding

University of Iowa Prevention Research Center for Rural HealthU48DP006389 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI AFIFI, RIMA · 2018 to 2023
$7.4M
Cancer Care Quality Training ProgramT32CA116339 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ETHAN M. BASCH, Stephanie Brooke Wheeler · 2018 to 2026
$3.0M
CDC HHS U48 DP006389CDC HHS U48 DP006396CDC HHS U48 DP006398CDC HHS U48 DP006399CDC HHS U48 DP006400NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006389NCI NIH HHS T32 CA116339NIH HHS T32-CA-116339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn several recent articles, authors have called for aligning the fields of implementation and improvement science. In this paper, we call for implementation science to also align with improvement practice. Multiple implementation scholars have highlighted the importance of designing implementation strategies to fit the existing culture, infrastructure, and practice of a healthcare system. Worldwide, healthcare systems are adopting improvement models as their primary approach to improving healthcare delivery and outcomes. The prevalence of improvement models raises the question of how implementation scientists might best align their efforts with healthcare systems' existing improvement infrastructure and practice. MAIN BODY: We describe three challenges and five benefits to aligning implementation science and improvement practice. Challenges include (1) use of different models, terminology, and methods, (2) a focus on generalizable versus local knowledge, and (3) limited evidence in support of the effectiveness of improvement tools and methods. We contend that implementation science needs to move beyond these challenges and work toward greater alignment with improvement practice. Aligning with improvement practice would benefit implementation science by (1) strengthening research/practice partnerships, (2) fostering local ownership of implementation, (3) generating practice-based evidence, (4) developing context-specific implementation strategies, and (5) building practice-level capacity to implement interventions and improve care. Each of these potential benefits is illustrated in a case study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network.

conclusionTo effectively integrate evidence-based interventions into routine practice, implementation scientists need to align their efforts with the improvement culture and practice that is driving change within healthcare systems worldwide. This paper provides concrete examples of how researchers have aligned implementation science with improvement practice across five implementation projects.

Indexed as

Cancer prevention and controlCase studiesImplementation scienceImprovement practiceQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID34496978
PMCPMC8424169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.