Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34496930›Full record

Trial reportTrials2021

Commentary: Pivoting during a pandemic: developing a new recruitment model for a randomised controlled trial in response to COVID-19.

Shakira Milton, Jennifer McIntosh, Lucy Boyd, Napin Karnchanachari, Finlay Macrae, Jon David Emery

Abstract readLetterRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Should I Take Aspirin? (SITA): randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for cancer chemoprevention.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shakira MiltonCentre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. shakira.milton@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8510-6351
Jennifer McIntoshDepartment of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6655-0940
Lucy BoydCentre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8287-6978
Napin KarnchanachariCentre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2816-8983
Finlay MacraeDepartment of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Jon David EmeryCentre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5274-6336

Funding

victorian cancer agency CPSRG19011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany non-COVID-19 trials were disrupted in 2020 and either struggled to recruit participants or stopped recruiting altogether. In December 2019, just before the pandemic, we were awarded a grant to conduct a randomised controlled trial, the Should I Take Aspirin? (SITA) trial, in Victoria, the Australian state most heavily affected by COVID-19 during 2020. MAIN BODY: We originally modelled the SITA trial recruitment method on previous trials where participants were approached and recruited in general practice waiting rooms. COVID-19 changed the way general practices worked, with a significant increase in telehealth consultations and restrictions on in person waiting room attendance. This prompted us to adapt our recruitment methods to this new environment to reduce potential risk to participants and staff, whilst minimising any recruitment bias. We designed a novel teletrial model, which involved calling participants prior to their general practitioner appointments to check their eligibility. We delivered the trial both virtually and face-to-face with similar overall recruitment rates to our previous studies.

conclusionWe developed an effective teletrial model which allowed us to complete recruitment at a high rate. The teletrial model is now being used in our other primary care trials as we continue to face the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAustraliaHumansPrimary Health CareSARS-CoV-2Bowel cancerCancer preventionColorectal cancerCOVID-19General practicePrimary careTrial participant recruitment

Identifiers

PMID34496930
PMCPMC8424147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.