Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34496899›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2021

Methylphenidate for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in patients with Smith-Magenis syndrome: protocol for a series of N-of-1 trials.

A R Müller, J R Zinkstok, N N J Rommelse, P M van de Ven, K C B Roes, F A Wijburg, E de Rooij-Askes, C Linders, E Boot, A M van Eeghen

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

A R MüllerAdvisium, 's Heeren Loo, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
J R ZinkstokDepartment of Psychiatry and Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
N N J RommelseKarakter, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
P M van de VenDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
K C B RoesDepartment of Health Evidence, Biostatistics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
F A WijburgDepartment of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
E de Rooij-AskesAdvisium, 's Heeren Loo, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
C LindersAdvisium, 's Heeren Loo, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
E BootAdvisium, 's Heeren Loo, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
A M van EeghenAdvisium, 's Heeren Loo, Amersfoort, the Netherlands. a.m.vaneeghen@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-8149-8645
Emma Kinderziekenhuis · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL's Heeren Loo · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmith-Magenis syndrome (SMS) is a rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by intellectual disability and severe behavioural and sleep disturbances. Often, patients with SMS are diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, the effectiveness of methylphenidate (MPH), the first-line pharmacological treatment for ADHD, in patients with SMS is unclear. Our objective is to examine the effectiveness of MPH for ADHD symptoms in individuals with SMS, proposing an alternative trial design as traditional randomized controlled trials are complex in these rare and heterogeneous patient populations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will initiate an N-of-1 series of double-blind randomized and placebo-controlled multiple crossover trials in six patients aged ≥ 6 years with a genetically confirmed SMS diagnosis and a multidisciplinary established ADHD diagnosis, according to a power analysis based on a summary measures analysis of the treatment effect. Each N-of-1 trial consists of a baseline period, dose titration phase, three cycles each including randomized intervention, placebo and washout periods, and follow-up. The intervention includes twice daily MPH (doses based on age and body weight). The primary outcome measure will be the subscale hyperactivity/inattention of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), rated daily. Secondary outcome measures are the shortened version of the Emotion Dysregulation Inventory (EDI) reactivity index, Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS), and the personal questionnaire (PQ). Statistical analysis will include a mixed model analysis. All subjects will receive an assessment of their individual treatment effect and data will be aggregated to investigate the effectiveness of MPH for ADHD in SMS at a population level.

conclusionsThis study will provide information on the effectiveness of MPH for ADHD in SMS, incorporating personalized outcome measures. This protocol presents the first properly powered N-of-1 study in a rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorder, providing a much-needed bridge between science and practice to optimize evidence-based and personalized care.

trial registrationThis study is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR9125).

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidateSmith-Magenis SyndromeDouble-Blind MethodHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidateADHDMethylphenidateMultiple crossoverN-of-1Rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorderSmith–Magenis syndrome

Identifiers

PMID34496899
PMCPMC8424817
OpenAlexW3197858956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.