Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34496878›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2021

Increased sensitivity to SMAC mimetic LCL161 identified by longitudinal ex vivo pharmacogenomics of recurrent, KRAS mutated rectal cancer liver metastases.

Kushtrim Kryeziu, Seyed H Moosavi, Christian H Bergsland, Marianne G Guren, Peter W Eide, Max Z Totland, Kristoffer Lassen, Andreas Abildgaard, Arild Nesbakken, Anita Sveen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Drug repurposing for cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kushtrim KryeziuDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Nydalen, P. O. Box 4953, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Seyed H MoosaviDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Nydalen, P. O. Box 4953, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Christian H BergslandDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Nydalen, P. O. Box 4953, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Marianne G GurenDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Peter W EideDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Nydalen, P. O. Box 4953, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Max Z TotlandDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Nydalen, P. O. Box 4953, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Kristoffer LassenDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Andreas AbildgaardDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Arild NesbakkenInstitute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anita SveenDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Nydalen, P. O. Box 4953, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Ragnhild A LotheDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Nydalen, P. O. Box 4953, 0424, Oslo, Norway. ragnhild.a.lothe@rr-research.no.ORCID 0000-0002-1693-1032
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

helse sør-øst rhf 2016123helse sør-øst rhf 2017102helse sør-øst rhf 2019042kreftforeningen 182759-2016kreftforeningen 190188-2017kreftforeningen 208336-2019norges forskningsråd 250993norges forskningsråd 287899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor heterogeneity is a primary cause of treatment failure. However, changes in drug sensitivity over time are not well mapped in cancer. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) may predict clinical drug responses ex vivo and offer an opportunity to evaluate novel treatment strategies in a personalized fashion. Here we have evaluated spatio-temporal functional and molecular dynamics of five PDO models established after hepatic re-resections and neoadjuvant combination chemotherapies in a patient with microsatellite stable and KRAS mutated metastatic rectal cancer. Histopathological differentiation phenotypes of the PDOs corresponded with the liver metastases, and ex vivo drug sensitivities generally reflected clinical responses and selection pressure, assessed in comparison to a reference data set of PDOs from metastatic colorectal cancers. PDOs from the initial versus the two recurrent metastatic settings showed heterogeneous cell morphologies, protein marker expression, and drug sensitivities. Exploratory analyses of a drug screen library of 33 investigational anticancer agents showed the strongest ex vivo sensitivity to the SMAC mimetic LCL161 in PDOs of recurrent disease compared to those of the initial metastasis. Functional analyses confirmed target inhibition and apoptosis induction in the LCL161 sensitive PDOs from the recurrent metastases. Gene expression analyses indicated an association between LCL161 sensitivity and tumor necrosis factor alpha signaling and RIPK1 gene expression. In conclusion, LCL161 was identified as a possible experimental therapy of a metastatic rectal cancer that relapsed after hepatic resection and standard systemic treatment.

Indexed as

Liver NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsHumansPharmacogeneticsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ThiazolesKRAS protein, humanLCL161Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ThiazolesLCL161Liver metastasisPatient-derived organoidRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID34496878
PMCPMC8424985
OpenAlexW3196968798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.