Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34496795›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2021

Informing antimicrobial management in the context of COVID-19: understanding the longitudinal dynamics of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin.

Damien K Ming, Ashleigh C Myall, Bernard Hernandez, Andrea Y Weiße, Robert L Peach, Mauricio Barahona, Timothy M Rawson, Alison H Holmes

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Damien K MingCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK. d.ming@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3125-6378
Ashleigh C MyallNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Bernard HernandezNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Andrea Y WeißeSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Robert L PeachDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Mauricio BarahonaDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Timothy M RawsonCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Alison H HolmesCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Hammersmith Hospital · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBImperial College London · GBUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

MRF_ MRF-145-0004-TPG-AVISOWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo characterise the longitudinal dynamics of C-reactive protein (CRP) and Procalcitonin (PCT) in a cohort of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 and support antimicrobial decision-making.

methodsLongitudinal CRP and PCT concentrations and trajectories of 237 hospitalised patients with COVID-19 were modelled. The dataset comprised of 2,021 data points for CRP and 284 points for PCT. Pairwise comparisons were performed between: (i) those with or without significant bacterial growth from cultures, and (ii) those who survived or died in hospital.

resultsCRP concentrations were higher over time in COVID-19 patients with positive microbiology (day 9: 236 vs 123 mg/L, p < 0.0001) and in those who died (day 8: 226 vs 152 mg/L, p < 0.0001) but only after day 7 of COVID-related symptom onset. Failure for CRP to reduce in the first week of hospital admission was associated with significantly higher odds of death. PCT concentrations were higher in patients with COVID-19 and positive microbiology or in those who died, although these differences were not statistically significant.

conclusionsBoth the absolute CRP concentration and the trajectory during the first week of hospital admission are important factors predicting microbiology culture positivity and outcome in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. Further work is needed to describe the role of PCT for co-infection. Understanding relationships of these biomarkers can support development of risk models and inform optimal antimicrobial strategies.

Indexed as

COVID-19ProcalcitoninAnti-Bacterial AgentsC-Reactive ProteinHumansSARS-CoV-2Anti-Bacterial AgentsC-Reactive ProteinProcalcitoninAntimicrobial stewardshipBacterial co-infectionBiomarkersClinical decision-supportCOVID-19Risk stratification

Identifiers

PMID34496795
PMCPMC8424157
OpenAlexW3196727909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.