Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34496791›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Prevalence, socioeconomic factors and obstetric outcomes associated with adolescent motherhood in Ceará, Brazil: a population-based study.

Shirley Kelly Bedê Bruno, Hermano Alexandre Lima Rocha, Sabrina Gabriele Maia Oliveira Rocha, David Augusto Batista Sá Araújo, Jocileide Sales Campos, Anamaria Cavalcante E Silva, Luciano Lima Correia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shirley Kelly Bedê BrunoState University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Hermano Alexandre Lima RochaDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. hermano@ufc.br.
Sabrina Gabriele Maia Oliveira RochaDepartment of Community Health, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
David Augusto Batista Sá AraújoDepartment of Community Health, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Jocileide Sales CamposISEC, University Center Unichristus, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Anamaria Cavalcante E SilvaISEC, University Center Unichristus, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Luciano Lima CorreiaDepartment of Community Health, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescent motherhood (AM) remains a public health problem, especially in low and middle income countries, where approximately 95% of these births occur. Evidence from studies with population representativeness about events associated with AM is limited. We assessed the prevalence of AM, as well as its association with Socioeconomic Factors and Obstetric Outcomes.

methodsA population-based cross-sectional study on maternal and child health of women aged 10 to 49 years, living in the state of Ceará, in northeastern Brazil was carried out to assess the prevalence of AM, as well as its association with Socioeconomic Factors and Obstetric Outcomes. The definition of adolescence used in the study was the one utilized by the WHO. In addition to the interview, data were double-checked according to the information in the government's pregnancy health booklet. Sample-adjusted logistic models to determine the association of socioeconomic factors and AM, as well as the association of AM with obstetric outcomes, with a causal approach to multivariate analyses, were used.

resultsThe prevalence of adolescent motherhood was 18.6%. Poverty and household crowding were associated with greater chances of AM (p values of 0.038 and <  0.001, respectively), as well as not being in a stable relationship (OR 2.26 (95%CI: 1.67, 3.07), p <  0.001). AM showed a greater chance of not using community health services (p <  0.001), had fewer prenatal consultations (β - 0.432 (95%CI: - 0.75, - 0.10)) and started prenatal care at a later date (β 0.38 (95%CI: 0.21, 0.55), p <  0.001)). AM are also less likely to be tested for HIV and more likely to have urinary tract infections.

conclusionsInterventions aimed at socially-vulnerable adolescents are suggested. However, if pregnant, adolescents should receive proactive and differentiated prenatal care.

Indexed as

Pregnancy in AdolescenceAdolescentAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPovertyPregnancyPrenatal CarePrevalenceSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultPregnancy in adolescence. Prevalence. Poverty. Health services. Obstetrics

Identifiers

PMID34496791
PMCPMC8427858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.