Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34496783›Full record

ReviewBMC pediatrics2021

Vitamin K prophylaxis in newborns.

Sophie Jullien

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Vitamin K prophylaxis in neonates: comparing two different oral regimens.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Vitamin K shot in newborn babies: An unprecedented sequelae.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophie JullienBarcelona Institute for Global Health, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. sophjullien@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5587-626X
Barcelona Institute for Global Health · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We looked at existing recommendations and supporting evidence on the effectiveness of vitamin K given after birth in preventing the haemorrhagic disease of the newborn (HDN).We conducted a literature search up to the 10th of December 2019 by using key terms and manual search in selected sources. We summarized the recommendations and the strength of the recommendation when and as reported by the authors. We summarized the main findings of systematic reviews with the certainty of the evidence as reported.All newborns should receive vitamin K prophylaxis, as it has been proven that oral and intramuscular prophylactic vitamin K given after birth are effective for preventing classical HDN. There are no randomized trials looking at the efficacy of vitamin K supplement on late HDN. There are no randomized trials comparing the oral and intramuscular route of administration of prophylactic vitamin K in newborns. From older trials and surveillance data, it seems that there is no significant difference between the intramuscular and the oral regimens for preventing classical and late HDN, provided that the oral regimen is duly completed. Evidence assessing vitamin K prophylaxis in preterm infants is scarce.

Indexed as

Vitamin KVitamin K Deficiency BleedingAdministration, OralHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInjections, IntramuscularSystematic Reviews as TopicVitamin KHaemorrhagic disease of newbornNewbornVitamin K deficiency bleedingVitamin K prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID34496783
PMCPMC8424792
OpenAlexW3198302125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.