Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34496745›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

An iteration model for identifying essential proteins by combining comprehensive PPI network with biological information.

Shiyuan Li, Zhen Zhang, Xueyong Li, Yihong Tan, Lei Wang, Zhiping Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shiyuan LiCollege of Computer Engineering and Applied Mathematics, Changsha University, Changsha, 410022, China.
Zhen ZhangCollege of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Changsha University, Changsha, 410022, China.
Xueyong LiCollege of Computer Engineering and Applied Mathematics, Changsha University, Changsha, 410022, China.
Yihong TanCollege of Computer Engineering and Applied Mathematics, Changsha University, Changsha, 410022, China. yhtan@ccsu.edu.cn.
Lei WangCollege of Computer Engineering and Applied Mathematics, Changsha University, Changsha, 410022, China.
Zhiping ChenCollege of Computer Engineering and Applied Mathematics, Changsha University, Changsha, 410022, China. zpchen@ccsu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4381-7497

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61672447National Natural Science Foundation of China 61873221Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (CN) 2018JJ4058Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (CN) 2019JJ70010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEssential proteins have great impacts on cell survival and development, and played important roles in disease analysis and new drug design. However, since it is inefficient and costly to identify essential proteins by using biological experiments, then there is an urgent need for automated and accurate detection methods. In recent years, the recognition of essential proteins in protein interaction networks (PPI) has become a research hotspot, and many computational models for predicting essential proteins have been proposed successively.

resultsIn order to achieve higher prediction performance, in this paper, a new prediction model called TGSO is proposed. In TGSO, a protein aggregation degree network is constructed first by adopting the node density measurement method for complex networks. And simultaneously, a protein co-expression interactive network is constructed by combining the gene expression information with the network connectivity, and a protein co-localization interaction network is constructed based on the subcellular localization data. And then, through integrating these three kinds of newly constructed networks, a comprehensive protein-protein interaction network will be obtained. Finally, based on the homology information, scores can be calculated out iteratively for different proteins, which can be utilized to estimate the importance of proteins effectively. Moreover, in order to evaluate the identification performance of TGSO, we have compared TGSO with 13 different latest competitive methods based on three kinds of yeast databases. And experimental results show that TGSO can achieve identification accuracies of 94%, 82% and 72% out of the top 1%, 5% and 10% candidate proteins respectively, which are to some degree superior to these state-of-the-art competitive models.

conclusionsWe constructed a comprehensive interactive network based on multi-source data to reduce the noise and errors in the initial PPI, and combined with iterative methods to improve the accuracy of necessary protein prediction, and means that TGSO may be conducive to the future development of essential protein recognition as well.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProtein Interaction MapsAlgorithmsProtein Interaction MappingProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeProteinsEssential proteinsMultiplex biological networksOrthologous proteinsSubcellular localization information

Identifiers

PMID34496745
PMCPMC8425031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.