Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34496677›Full record

SynthesisJournal of evidence-based integrative medicine

Complementary and Alternative Therapies for Weight Loss: A Narrative Review.

Pei Lin Lua, Nurul Afiedia Roslim, Aryati Ahmad, Mardiana Mansor, Myat Moe Thwe Aung, Farrahdilla Hamzah

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of evidence-based integrative medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Intermittent Fasting Among Adults: Patterns, Prevalence, and Health Benefits.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pei Lin LuaFaculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Terengganu, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-9280-0918
Nurul Afiedia RoslimFaculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Terengganu, Malaysia.
Aryati AhmadFaculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Terengganu, Malaysia.
Mardiana MansorFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Terengganu, Malaysia.
Myat Moe Thwe AungFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Terengganu, Malaysia.
Farrahdilla HamzahFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Terengganu, Malaysia.
Sultan Zainal Abidin University · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite various strategies, overweight and obesity problems are still increasingly prevalent worldwide with serious health outcomes. Consequently, the continuous demand for more effective, safe and acceptable therapies for reducing body weight is also escalating-including complementary and alternative therapies (CATs). The aim of this review is to provide a summary of the most commonly- and recently-used CATs, with evaluation of their safety and efficacy for weight loss. Electronic scientific databases such as Scopus, PubMed and EBSCO Host were explored for articles that reported CATs for overweight and obesity treatment from 2015 to December 2019. Only systematic reviews, meta-analysis and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English were included. Studies whereby CATs were not utilized for reducing body weight were excluded. Eight systematic reviews and meta-analyses and 11 additional RCTs with 765 participants (50.2% overweight and 49.8% obese) related to hypnotherapy, acupuncture and dietary supplements met the inclusion criteria. Their results suggested that spirulina, chitosan, probiotic, EPA + DHA, vitamin D, fiber, and herbal extract supplementation may all provide small reductions in body weight (ranging from 1-10 kg). Interestingly, hypnotherapy and acupuncture reported significantly greater reduction in body weight compared with placebo (p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Nonetheless, the evidence is still relatively limited and not encouraging to provide a definitive conclusion due to the methodological shortcomings and the presence of adverse events in chitosan and fiber supplementation. Hence, studies of this nature need to be further replicated and improved to corroborate the efficacy and safety of the CATs to combat weight issues.

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesWeight LossBody WeightHumansObesityOverweightcomplementary therapiesdietary supplementsobesityoverweightweight loss

Identifiers

PMID34496677
PMCPMC8436299
OpenAlexW3198266749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.