Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34496156›Full record

ArticleEthics & human research2021

Creating a Research Ethics Consultation Service: Issues to Consider.

Holly A Taylor, Kathryn M Porter, Erin Talati Paquette, Jennifer B McCormick, Emma Tumilty, Jason F Arnold, Kayte Spector-Bagdady, Marion Danis, Debra Brandt, Jina Shah and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethics & human research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Holly A TaylorResearch bioethicist in the Department of Bioethics at the Clinical Center at the National Institutes of Health.
Kathryn M PorterResearch scientist at the Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute.
Erin Talati PaquetteAssistant professor of pediatrics (critical care) at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago and an assistant professor of law (by courtesy) at the Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law.
Jennifer B McCormickAssociate professor in the Department of Humanities in the College of Medicine at the Pennsylvania State University.
Emma TumiltyBioethicist and lecturer at the School of Medicine in the Faculty of Health at Deakin University Waurn Ponds, Geelong, Australia.
Jason F ArnoldSenior fellow of bioethics and health policy and the assistant director of the CTR fellowship program at the Institute of Human Values in Health Care at the Medical University of South Carolina.
Kayte Spector-BagdadyAssociate director of the Center for Bioethics & Social Sciences in Medicine and an assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Michigan Medical School.
Marion DanisHead of the section on ethics and health policy in the Department of Bioethics at the Clinical Center of the National Institutes of Health.
Debra BrandtResearch assistant professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Iowa.
Jina ShahSenior director of patient safety and pharmacovigilance at Kite, a Gilead Sciences company, in Santa Monica, CA.
Benjamin S WilfondProfessor in the divisions of bioethics and palliative care and pulmonary and sleep medicine in the Department of Pediatrics at the Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute at the University of Washington School of Medicine.
Lisa M LeeAssociate vice president for research and innovation, the director of scholarly integrity and research compliance, and a professor of population health sciences at Virginia Tech.

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR)UL1TR002240 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUMENG, JULIE C, MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2017 to 2022
$54.9M
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
The University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR002537 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HANSEN, MARLAN R, WINOKUR, PATRICIA · 2018 to 2022
$20.0M
ADaPT to Engage: Assessing for Disparities and Potential Targets for Intervention to Engage Acutely Ill Children in ResearchK23HD098289 · NICHD · LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO · PI PAQUETTE, ERIN D · 2020 to 2024
$722k
Intramural Program of the Clinical Center at the National Institutes of Health (NIH)NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002240NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002537NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD098289NICHD NIH HHS L40 HD089260NIH Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA) UL1TR002240NIH Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA) UL1TR002537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides pragmatic advice for organizations interested in creating a research ethics consultation service (RECS). A robust RECS has the potential to build capacity among investigators to identify and consider the ethical issues they encounter while conducting their research. Determining whether to establish an RECS should begin with an institutional-needs assessment that includes three key questions: What are the current resources available to research teams to navigate ethical concerns that arise from their research? Is there a demand or perceived need for more resources? Is there institutional support (financial and otherwise) to establish and maintain an RECS? If this results in the decision to establish the consultation service, relevant institutional stakeholders must be identified and consulted, and personnel with the requisite skills recruited. The next step is to establish an RECS and build the infrastructure to process and respond to requests. The RECS's long-term sustainability will depend on a stable source of funding and a mechanism to receive constructive feedback to ensure that the service is meeting the institutional needs it set out to address.

Indexed as

Ethics ConsultationEthics, ResearchHumanshuman research ethicsinstitutional review board (IRB)research ethics consultationresearch ethics consultation service

Identifiers

PMID34496156
PMCPMC9254506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.