Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34496152›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2021

Acceptability and satisfaction towards self-collection for chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing among transgender women in Tangerine Clinic, Thailand: shifting towards the new normal.

Akarin Hiransuthikul, Rena Janamnuaysook, Linrada Himma, Chiraporn Taya, Tidarat Amatsombat, Phongdanai Chumnanwet, Kritima Samitpol, Artsanee Chancham, Jiratchaya Kongkapan, Jeeranuch Rueannak and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Akarin HiransuthikulInstitute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI), Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1906-8171
Rena JanamnuaysookInstitute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI), Bangkok, Thailand.
Linrada HimmaInstitute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI), Bangkok, Thailand.
Chiraporn TayaInstitute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI), Bangkok, Thailand.
Tidarat AmatsombatInstitute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI), Bangkok, Thailand.
Phongdanai ChumnanwetInstitute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI), Bangkok, Thailand.
Kritima SamitpolInstitute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI), Bangkok, Thailand.
Artsanee ChanchamInstitute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI), Bangkok, Thailand.
Jiratchaya KongkapanInstitute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI), Bangkok, Thailand.
Jeeranuch RueannakInstitute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI), Bangkok, Thailand.
Pintusorn GetwongsaInstitute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI), Bangkok, Thailand.
Peevara SrimanusInstitute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI), Bangkok, Thailand.
Nipat TeeratakulpisarnInstitute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI), Bangkok, Thailand.
Narukjaporn ThammajarukInstitute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI), Bangkok, Thailand.
Matthew AveryFHI 360 and LINKAGES, Bangkok, Thailand.
Tanyaporn WansomFHI 360 and LINKAGES, Bangkok, Thailand.
Stephen MillsFHI 360 and LINKAGES, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7326-6342
Reshmie A RamautarsingInstitute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI), Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-6293-9422
Nittaya PhanuphakInstitute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI), Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0036-3165
HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration · THChulalongkorn University · THThai-Nichi Institute of Technology · TH

Funding

LINKAGES Project AID-OAA-A-14-00045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProvider-collected swabs are an unappealing procedure for many transgender women and may have led to suboptimal rates of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) testing. Self-collection for CT/NG testing is recommended for men who have sex with men. However, the information on acceptability and clinical performance to support a recommendation for transgender women is lacking. We aimed to determine the acceptability and satisfaction towards self-collection for CT/NG testing among Thai transgender women.

methodsThai transgender women who attended Tangerine Clinic (a transgender-led, integrated, gender-affirming care and sexual health services clinic in Bangkok, Thailand) between May and July 2020 and had condomless sexual intercourse within the past six months were offered to collect urine and perform self-swabs of pharyngeal, rectal, and if applicable, neovaginal compartments for pooled nucleic acid amplification testing for CT/NG infections. Participants received a diagram, video and oral instructions about how to perform self-collection procedure. Those who accepted self-collection were also offered to receive provider collection to evaluate the performance between the two methods. Self-administered questionnaires were used to assess satisfaction.

resultsAmong 216 transgender women enrolled, 142 (65.7%) accepted self-collection. All who accepted had pharyngeal, rectal and urine samples collected. Of 31 transgender women who had undergone genital surgery, 28 (90.3%) accepted neovaginal self-swab. The acceptance rate increased from 46.2% in May to 84.5% in July 2020. One participant had an invalid result. All transgender women who accepted self-collection could perform it without assistance, and 82.8% were highly satisfied with the method. None reported dissatisfaction. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, provider collection services were discontinued early, and only eight transgender women were able to perform both methods for performance evaluation. The performance agreement was 100%.

conclusionsThai transgender women had high acceptability and satisfaction towards self-collection for CT/NG testing. The performance was promising compared to provider collection. Our results support the implementation of self-collection to the sexually transmitted infection services, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic where physical distancing is the new normal. A larger study is warranted to determine the performance of self-collection for CT/NG testing in each anatomical compartment and confirm the performance between self-collection and provider collection.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CarePersonal SatisfactionTransgender PersonsAdultChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisCOVID-19FemaleGonorrheaHumansMaleNeisseria gonorrhoeaePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Self CareSpecimen Handlingacceptabilitychlamydiagonorrheasatisfactionself-collectiontransgender women

Identifiers

PMID34496152
PMCPMC8425782
OpenAlexW3198144553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.