Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34496008›Full record

ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2021

Chromosomal aberrations after induced pluripotent stem cells reprogramming.

Isadora May Vaz, Tamara Borgonovo, Tais Hanae Kasai-Brunswick, Danúbia Silva Dos Santos, Fernanda Cristina Paccola Mesquita, Juliana Ferreira Vasques, Fernanda Gubert, Carmen Lúcia Kuniyoshi Rebelatto, Alexandra Cristina Senegaglia, Paulo Roberto Slud Brofman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. TET3 protects theiScience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Gene-repaired iPS cells as novel approach for patient withFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Isadora May VazPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Escola de Medicina, Núcleo de Tecnologia Celular, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7719-5702
Tamara BorgonovoPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Escola de Medicina, Núcleo de Tecnologia Celular, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Tais Hanae Kasai-BrunswickUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Danúbia Silva Dos SantosUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Fernanda Cristina Paccola MesquitaUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Juliana Ferreira VasquesUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Fernanda GubertInstituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Medicina Regenerativa, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Carmen Lúcia Kuniyoshi RebelattoPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Escola de Medicina, Núcleo de Tecnologia Celular, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Alexandra Cristina SenegagliaPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Escola de Medicina, Núcleo de Tecnologia Celular, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Paulo Roberto Slud BrofmanPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Escola de Medicina, Núcleo de Tecnologia Celular, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRNational Institute of Science and Technology in Regenerative Medicine · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are generated from adult cells that have been reprogrammed to pluripotency. However, in vitro cultivation and genetic reprogramming increase genetic instability, which could result in chromosomal abnormalities. Maintenance of genetic stability after reprogramming is required for possible experimental and clinical applications. The aim of this study was to analyze chromosomal alterations by using the G-banding karyotyping method applied to 97 samples from 38 iPSC cell lines generated from peripheral blood or Wharton's jelly. Samples from patients with long QT syndrome, Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and from normal individuals revealed the following chromosomal alterations: acentric fragments, chromosomal fusions, premature centromere divisions, double minutes, radial figures, ring chromosomes, polyploidies, inversions and trisomies. An analysis of two samples generated from Wharton's jelly before and after reprogramming showed that abnormal clones can emerge or be selected and generate an altered lineage. IPSC lines may show clonal and nonclonal chromosomal aberrations in several passages (from P6 to P34), but these aberrations are more common in later passages. Many important chromosomal aberrations were detected, showing that G-banding is very useful for evaluating genetic instability with important repercussions for the application of iPSC lines.

Identifiers

PMID34496008
PMCPMC8425414
OpenAlexW3196457553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.