Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34495974›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Association between electronic nicotine delivery systems and electronic non-nicotine delivery systems with initiation of tobacco use in individuals aged < 20 years. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sze Lin Yoong, Alix Hall, Heidi Turon, Emily Stockings, Alecia Leonard, Alice Grady, Flora Tzelepis, John Wiggers, Hebe Gouda, Ranti Fayokun and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of School-Based Preventive Interventions Targeting E-Cigarette Use Among Adolescents.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. E-cigarettes and nicotine abstinence: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  10. Factors Associated With Victorian Adolescents' Harm Perceptions and Attitudes About e-Cigarettes.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  11. The geographic distribution and community correlates of electronic cigarette use in Canada.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. "I Don't Really Understand It All!": A Qualitative Study of Parental Perceptions of Australian Vaping Laws.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sze Lin YoongSchool of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0836-017X
Alix HallSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Heidi TuronSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Emily StockingsNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Alecia LeonardSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Alice GradySchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Flora TzelepisSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
John WiggersSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Hebe GoudaNo Tobacco Unit, Department of Health Promotion, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ranti FayokunNo Tobacco Unit, Department of Health Promotion, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Alison CommarNo Tobacco Unit, Department of Health Promotion, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Vinayak M PrasadNo Tobacco Unit, Department of Health Promotion, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Luke WolfendenSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUWorld Health Organization · CHUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis systematic review described the association between electronic nicotine delivery systems and electronic non-nicotine delivery systems (ENDS/ENNDS) use among non-smoking children and adolescents aged <20 years with subsequent tobacco use.

methodsWe searched five electronic databases and the grey literature up to end of September 2020. Prospective longitudinal studies that described the association between ENDS/ENNDS use, and subsequent tobacco use in those aged < 20 years who were non-smokers at baseline were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist was used to assess risk of bias. Data were extracted by two reviewers and pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. We generated unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) describing associations between ENDS/ENNDS and tobacco use.

findingsA total of 36 publications met the eligibility criteria, of which 25 were included in the systematic review (23 in the meta-analysis) after exclusion of overlapping studies. Sixteen studies had high to moderate risk of bias. Ever users of ENDS/ENNDS had over three times the risk of ever cigarette use (ARR 3·01 (95% CI: 2·37, 3·82; p<0·001, I2: 82·3%), and current cigarette use had over two times the risk (ARR 2·56 (95% CI: 1·61, 4·07; p<0·001, I2: 77·3%) at follow up. Among current ENDS/ENNDS users, there was a significant association with ever (ARR 2·63 (95% CI: 1·94, 3·57; p<0·001, I2: 21·2%)), but not current cigarette use (ARR 1·88 (95% CI: 0·34, 10·30; p = 0·47, I2: 0%)) at follow up. For other tobacco use, ARR ranged between 1·55 (95% CI 1·07, 2·23) and 8·32 (95% CI: 1·20, 57·04) for waterpipe and pipes, respectively. Additionally, two studies examined the use of ENNDS (non-nicotine devices) and found a pooled adjusted RR of 2·56 (95% CI: 0·47, 13·94, p = 0.035).

conclusionThere is an urgent need for policies that regulate the availability, accessibility, and marketing of ENDS/ENNDS to children and adolescents. Governments should also consider adopting policies to prevent ENDS/ENNDS uptake and use in children and adolescents, up to and including a ban for this group.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAdolescentCognitionHumansProspective StudiesTobacco ProductsTobacco UseYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34495974
PMCPMC8425526
OpenAlexW3198107605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.