Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34495491›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2022

Granuloma Annulare: An Updated Review of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Treatment Options.

Tejas P Joshi, Madeleine Duvic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Dermatologic Toxicities Induced by JAK Inhibitors.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Perforating Granuloma Annulare with Cysts and Comedones.Dermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tejas P JoshiSchool of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. tejas.joshi@bcm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7897-2940
Madeleine DuvicDepartment of Dermatology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Granuloma annulare (GA) is an inflammatory granulomatous skin disease that can be localized (localized GA) or disseminated (generalized GA), with patch, perforating, and subcutaneous subtypes being less common variants of this benign condition. Recently, new research has emerged that further elucidates GA epidemiology and etiopathogenesis; importantly, new therapeutic options for GA have also been described, although there remains a paucity of randomized controlled studies. In this review, we summarize recent updates on GA epidemiology and etiopathogenesis and offer an updated review of the therapeutic options for GA currently reported in the literature. We hope that the current review galvanizes randomized controlled studies that will in turn help lead to the recommendation of evidence-based treatments for GA.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAntimalarialsBiological TherapyComorbidityDermatologic AgentsDiabetes ComplicationsDiagnosis, DifferentialGlucocorticoidsGranuloma AnnulareHumansIatrogenic DiseaseInfectionsMethotrexateNeoplasmsPentoxifyllinePhosphodiesterase 4 InhibitorsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimalarialsapremilastDermatologic AgentsGlucocorticoidsMethotrexatePentoxifyllinePhosphodiesterase 4 InhibitorsPiperidinesPyrimidinesThalidomidetofacitinib

Identifiers

PMID34495491
PMCPMC8423598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.