ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022
Degradation of oxytetracycline in aqueous solution by heat-activated peroxydisulfate and peroxymonosulfate oxidation.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mechanism of Oxytetracycline Removal by Coconut Shell Biochar Loaded with Nano-Zero-Valent Iron.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oxytetracycline (OTC) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that resists biodegradation and poses a risk to the ecosystem. This study investigated the degradation of OTC by heat-activated peroxydisulfate (PDS) and peroxymonosulfate (PMS) processes. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to evaluate the effect of process parameters, namely initial pH, oxidant concentration, temperature, and reaction time on the OTC removal efficiency. According to the results of the RSM models, all four independent variables were significant for both PDS and PMS processes. The optimum process parameters for the heat-activated PDS process were pH 8.9, PDS concentration 3.9 mM, temperature 72.9°C, and reaction time 26.5 min. For the heat-activated PMS process, optimum conditions were pH 9.0, PMS concentration 4.0 mM, temperature 75.0°C, and reaction time 20.0 min. The predicted OTC removal efficiencies for the PDS and PMS processes were 89.7% and 84.0%, respectively. As a result of the validation experiments conducted at optimum conditions, the obtained OTC removal efficiencies for the PDS and PMS processes were 87.6 ± 4.2 and 80.2± 4.6, respectively. PDS process has higher kinetic constants at all pH values than the PMS process. Both processes were effective in OTC removal from aqueous solution and RSM was efficient in process optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34495474What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.