Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34495471›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

A review exploring the overarching burden of Zika virus with emphasis on epidemiological case studies from Brazil.

Merve Tunali, Alexandro André Radin, Selma Başıbüyük, Anwar Musah, Iuri Valerio Graciano Borges, Orhan Yenigun, Aisha Aldosery, Patty Kostkova, Wellington P Dos Santos, Tiago Massoni and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Antiviral Activity of Quercetin Hydrate against Zika Virus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Chikungunya: risks for travellers.Journal of travel medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Merve TunaliInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Boğaziçi University, Bebek, 34342, Istanbul, Turkey.
Alexandro André RadinPublic Health Department, Araucaria City Hall, Araucaria, PR, 83702-080, Brazil.
Selma BaşıbüyükInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Boğaziçi University, Bebek, 34342, Istanbul, Turkey.
Anwar MusahUCL Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies, Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
Iuri Valerio Graciano BorgesDepartamento de Ciências Atmosféricas, Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, 05508-090, Brazil.
Orhan YenigunInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Boğaziçi University, Bebek, 34342, Istanbul, Turkey.
Aisha AldoseryUCL Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies, Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
Patty KostkovaUCL Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies, Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
Wellington P Dos SantosDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, 50740-550, Brazil.
Tiago MassoniDepartment Systems and Computing, Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, PB, 58429-900, Brazil.
Livia Marcia Mosso DutraDepartamento de Ciências Atmosféricas, Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, 05508-090, Brazil.
Giselle Machado Magalhaes MorenoDepartamento de Ciências Atmosféricas, Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, 05508-090, Brazil.
Clarisse Lins de LimaPolytechnic School of Pernambuco, University of Pernambuco (Poli-UPE), Recife, PE, 50720-001, Brazil.
Ana Clara Gomes da SilvaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, 50740-550, Brazil.
Tércio AmbrizziDepartamento de Ciências Atmosféricas, Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, 05508-090, Brazil.
Rosmeri Porfirio da RochaDepartamento de Ciências Atmosféricas, Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, 05508-090, Brazil.
Kate E JonesDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, University College London, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
Luiza C CamposDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, WC1E 6BT, London, UK. l.campos@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2714-7358

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2019/23553-1Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2020/11567-5Natural Environment Research Council NE/T013664/1TÜBİTAK 119N373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores the main factors for mosquito-borne transmission of the Zika virus by focusing on environmental, anthropogenic, and social risks. A literature review was conducted bringing together related information from this genre of research from peer-reviewed publications. It was observed that environmental conditions, especially precipitation, humidity, and temperature, played a role in the transmission. Furthermore, anthropogenic factors including sanitation, urbanization, and environmental pollution promote the transmission by affecting the mosquito density. In addition, socioeconomic factors such as poverty as well as social inequality and low-quality housing have also an impact since these are social factors that limit access to certain facilities or infrastructure which, in turn, promote transmission when absent (e.g., piped water and screened windows). Finally, the paper presents short-, mid-, and long-term preventative solutions together with future perspectives. This is the first review exploring the effects of anthropogenic aspects on Zika transmission with a special emphasis in Brazil.

Indexed as

AedesCulicidaeZika VirusZika Virus InfectionAnimalsBrazilMosquito VectorsAe. mosquitoArbovirusEnvironmental conditionsPrecipitationSanitationSocial conditions

Identifiers

PMID34495471
PMCPMC8500866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.