Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34495454›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2022

Student and pre-registration pharmacist performance in a UK Prescribing Assessment.

Ailsa Power, Derek Stewart, Gail Craig, Anne Boyter, Fiona Reid, Fiona Stewart, Scott Cunningham, Simon Maxwell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ailsa PowerPharmacy NHS Education for Scotland, 2 Central Quay, Glasgow, G38BW, Scotland. ailsa.power@nhs.scot.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4744-7371
Derek StewartCollege of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, PO Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.
Gail CraigPharmacy NHS Education for Scotland, 2 Central Quay, Glasgow, G38BW, Scotland.
Anne BoyterStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy & Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, 161 Cathedral St, Glasgow, G4 0RE, Scotland.
Fiona ReidRetired, Formerly of NHS Education for Scotland, 2 Central Quay, Glasgow, G38BW, Scotland.
Fiona StewartPharmacy NHS Education for Scotland, 2 Central Quay, Glasgow, G38BW, Scotland.
Scott CunninghamSchool of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, AB10 7GJ, Scotland.
Simon MaxwellClinical Pharmacology Unit, Edinburgh Medical School, Medical Education Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH14 2XU, Scotland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Student and pre-registration pharmacist performance in a UK Prescribing Assessment': room for improvement and need for curricular change Background Increasingly the global policy direction is for patient-facing pharmacist prescribers. The 'UK Prescribing Safety Assessment' (PSA) was developed for medical graduates to demonstrate prescribing competencies in relation to the safe and effective use of medicines. Objectives To determine PSA performance of final year undergraduate student pharmacists (year 4) and pre-registration pharmacy graduates (year 5) and explore their opinions on its suitability. Setting Scotland, UK Methods Final year undergraduates (n = 238) and pre-registration pharmacists (n = 167) were briefed and undertook the PSA. PSA questions were mapped to specific thematic areas with 30 questions over 60 min. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics. A questionnaire was completed to gauge opinions on appropriateness of the PSA. Main Outcome Measure PSA scores Results Mean total PSA score for pre-registration pharmacists (64.4, SD 10) was significantly higher than for undergraduates (51.2, SD 12.0,) (p < 0.001). Pre-registration pharmacists performed significantly better across all question areas (all p < 0.001 other than 'adverse drug reactions', p < 0.01). Hospital pre-registration pharmacists performed statistically significantly better than community with higher overall scores (67.4, SD 9.8 v 63.2, SD 9.8, p < 0.05). Positive views on the appropriateness of the approach and the usability of the online interface were obtained from participants. Conclusion Hospital pre-registration pharmacists performed better than the undergraduates, but there is a need to improve prescribing skills in all, most notably in diagnostic skills. The PSA is acceptable to the participants. These results will help inform pharmacy curricula development and provides a cross-disciplinary method of assessment of prescribing competence.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical ServicesPharmacistsDrug PrescriptionsHumansProfessional RoleScotlandStudentsCompetencyPharmacy educationPrescribing skills

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.