Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34495415›Full record

Observational studyHuman genetics2022

Diagnostic yield of clinical exome sequencing as a first-tier genetic test for the diagnosis of genetic disorders in pediatric patients: results from a referral center study.

Jean-Philippe Mergnac, Arnaud Wiedemann, Céline Chery, Jean-Marie Ravel, Farès Namour, Jean-Louis Guéant, François Feillet, Abderrahim Oussalah

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Human genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Heterozygous Mutations in Both theClinical case reports · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genetic diagnosis for adult patients at a genetic clinic.Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jean-Philippe MergnacReference Center for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (ORPHA67872), University Hospital of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France.
Arnaud WiedemannReference Center for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (ORPHA67872), University Hospital of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France.
Céline CheryReference Center for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (ORPHA67872), University Hospital of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France.
Jean-Marie RavelReference Center for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (ORPHA67872), University Hospital of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France.
Farès NamourReference Center for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (ORPHA67872), University Hospital of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France.
Jean-Louis GuéantReference Center for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (ORPHA67872), University Hospital of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France.
François FeilletReference Center for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (ORPHA67872), University Hospital of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France.
Abderrahim OussalahReference Center for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (ORPHA67872), University Hospital of Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France. abderrahim.oussalah@univ-lorraine.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9731-4529

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of next-generation sequencing enabled a cost-effective and straightforward diagnostic approach to genetic disorders using clinical exome sequencing (CES) panels. We performed a retrospective observational study to assess the diagnostic yield of CES as a first-tier genetic test in 128 consecutive pediatric patients addressed to a referral center in the North-East of France for a suspected genetic disorder, mainly an inborn error of metabolism between January 2016 and August 2020. CES was performed using the TruSight One (4811 genes) or the TruSight One expanded (6699 genes) panel on an Illumina sequencing platform. The median age was 6.5 years (IQR 2.0-12.0) with 43% of males (55/128), and the median disease duration was 7 months (IQR 1-47). In the whole analysis, the CES diagnostic yield was 55% (70/128). The median test-to-report time was 5 months (IQR 4-7). According to CES indications, the CES diagnostic yields were 81% (21/26) for hyperlipidemia, 75% (6/8) for osteogenesis imperfecta, 64% (25/39) for metabolic disorders, 39% (10/26) for neurological disorders, and 28% (8/29) for the subgroup of patients with miscellaneous conditions. Our results demonstrate the usefulness of a CES-based diagnosis as a first-tier genetic test to establish a molecular diagnosis in pediatric patients with a suspected genetic disorder with a median test-to-report time of 5 months. It highlights the importance of a close interaction between the pediatrician with expertise in genetic disorders and the molecular medicine physician to optimize both CES indication and interpretation. Diagnostic yield of clinical exome sequencing (CES) as a first-tier genetic test for diagnosing genetic disorders in 128 consecutive pediatric patients referred to a reference center in the North-East of France for a suspected genetic disorder, mainly an inborn error of metabolism between January 2016 and August 2020. The CES diagnostic yields are reported in the whole population and patients' subgroups (hyperlipidemia, osteogenesis imperfecta, metabolic diseases, neurological disorders, miscellaneous conditions) (Icons made by Flaticon, flaticon.com; CC-BY-3.0).

Indexed as

Nervous System DiseasesOsteogenesis ImperfectaChildExomeGenetic TestingHumansMaleReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.