Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34495410›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2021

Efficacy of estimating VO

Jeremy B Ducharme, Ann L Gibson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of vitamin DJournal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy B DucharmeDepartment of Health, Exercise and Sports Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA. jducharme@unm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1653-8721
Ann L GibsonDepartment of Health, Exercise and Sports Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
New Mexico Department of Health · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInvestigate difference, agreement, and bias between maximal oxygen consumption (VO

methodsEleven men and nine women (age: 61.8 ± 8.5 years, VO

resultsThere were no statistical differences between methods of assessing VO

conclusionBoth versions of the HRRM have poor agreement, relatively large SEEs, and a bias to misrepresent VO

Indexed as

AgedCalorimetry, IndirectExercise TestFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygen ConsumptionMaximal heart rateMaximal oxygen uptakePredictionResting heart rateVerificationVO2max

Identifiers

PMID34495410
OpenAlexW3196504785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.