Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34495384›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Exploration of motivation to participate in a study of cancer-related cognitive impairment among patients with newly diagnosed aggressive lymphoma: a qualitative sub-study.

Priscilla Gates, Haryana Dhillon, Karla Gough, Carlene Wilson, Eliza Hawkes, Lindsay Scudder, Tania Cushion, Meinir Krishnasamy

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Cancer-related cognitive impairment in patients with newly diagnosed aggressive lymphoma undergoing standard chemotherapy: a longitudinal feasibility study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Trial
  4. A novel ecological momentary assessment app for the investigation of daily cognitive functioning in breast cancer survivors: a feasibility study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Priscilla GatesDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. priscilla.gates@austin.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7978-5802
Haryana DhillonFaculty of Science, School of Psychology, Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-Based Decision-Making, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0252-2203
Karla GoughDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Dentistry & Health Sciences, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2819-4217
Carlene WilsonOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1883-4690
Eliza HawkesDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0376-2559
Lindsay ScudderDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Tania CushionDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Meinir KrishnasamyCancer Nursing Research Group, Department of Nursing/Centre for Cancer Research, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3050-4213

Funding

Victorian Cancer Agency Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre Supportive Care Research PhD scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a recognised adverse consequence of cancer and its treatment. This qualitative sub-study was undertaken as part of a larger prospective longitudinal study in which recruitment and retention were very high. The aim was to gain an understanding of participants reasons for ongoing participation, at a time of heightened stress related to a new diagnosis of aggressive lymphoma and the rapid commencement of treatment.

methodsThis qualitative descriptive sub-study included semi-structured interviews with twenty-seven participants. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and a thematic descriptive approach was used to analyse the data.

resultsTwenty-seven interviews were completed. Four themes described participants' motivation to consent and continue with the study. These included ease of participation, personal values, self-help and valued additional support. Participants understood the requirements of the study, and data collection occurring during hospital visits was perceived to be convenient. Interviewees confirmed that the study fulfilled desire to "help others". Although testing was intense and challenging, it provided feedback on current functioning and was described by some as a "welcome distraction" and enjoyable. Finally, interaction with the study nurse was perceived as an additional beneficial oversight and support.

conclusionAchieving sustained participation in a prospective study with patients undergoing treatment is facilitated where the logistical demands of data collection are minimised; a clinician from the service is included; the tasks are seen as inherently interesting; and care is taken to provide empathic support throughout.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619001649101.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionLymphoma, Non-HodgkinNeoplasmsAustraliaHumansLongitudinal StudiesMotivationProspective StudiesQualitative ResearchAggressive lymphomaCancer-related cognitive impairmentMotivationParticipationQualitative

Identifiers

PMID34495384
PMCPMC8727392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.