Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34495375›Full record

Trial reportDiabetologia2021

Flash glucose monitoring and automated bolus calculation in type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections: a 26 week randomised, controlled, multicentre trial.

Anna Lilja Secher, Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard, Ole L Svendsen, Birthe Gade-Rasmussen, Thomas Almdal, Linda Raimond, Dorte Vistisen, Kirsten Nørgaard

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03682237 (Optimizing Metabolic Control in Type 1 Diabetes With Multiple Daily Insulin Injections - Flash Glucose Monitoring, Carbohydrate Counting With Automated Bolus Calculation, or Both?), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03682237 nacompletednot on this map

Optimizing Metabolic Control in Type 1 Diabetes With Multiple Daily Insulin Injections - Flash Glucose Monitoring, Carbohydrate Counting With Automated Bolus Calculation, or Both?

TypeinterventionalSponsorSteno Diabetes Center CopenhagenRan2018 to 2020Enrolled184ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1ArmsCarbohydrate counting, automated bolus calculation, Flash glucose monitoring (FGM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Lilja SecherSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark. anna.elisabet.lilja.secher@regionh.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-2247-6213
Ulrik Pedersen-BjergaardDepartment of Endocrinology & Nephrology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0588-4880
Ole L SvendsenFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Birthe Gade-RasmussenDepartment of Endocrinology, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Thomas AlmdalFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Linda RaimondSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.
Dorte VistisenSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.
Kirsten NørgaardSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1620-8271
University of Copenhagen · DKSteno Diabetes Centers · DKHvidovre Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisWe aimed to compare the effects of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) and carbohydrate counting with automated bolus calculation (ABC) with usual care.

methodsIn a randomised, controlled, open-label trial carried out at five diabetes clinics in the Capital Region of Denmark, 170 adults with type 1 diabetes for ≥1 year, multiple daily insulin injections and HbA

resultsBaseline characteristics were comparable across arms: mean age 47 (SD 13.7) years, median (IQR) diabetes duration 18 (10-28) years and HbA CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationisCGM alone did not improve time in range, but treatment satisfaction increased in technology-naive people with type 1 diabetes and suboptimal HbA

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03682237.

fundingThe study is investigator initiated and financed by the Capital Region of Denmark.

Indexed as

Blood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1AdultBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinAutomated bolus calculationContinuous glucose monitoringFlash glucose monitoringGlycaemic controlHbA1cMultiple daily insulin injectionsTime in rangeType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID34495375
OpenAlexW3197262415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.