Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34495351›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Two Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in children.

Soňa Šikolová, Milan Urík, Dagmar Hošnová, Vít Kruntorád, Michal Bartoš, Oldřich Motyka, Petr Jabandžiev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Precise bonebridge implantation in challenging cases: a novel approach using virtual planning and electromagnetic navigation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A new active bone-conduction implant: surgical experiences and audiological outcomes in patients with bilateral congenital microtia.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Surgical and audiological outcomes with a new transcutaneous bone conduction device with reduced transducer thickness in children.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Multicentric study on surgical information and early safety and performance results with the Bonebridge BCI 602: an active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Review
  11. [Clinical research progress of bonebridge implantation].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Soňa ŠikolováDepartment of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Brno, Černopolní 9, 61300, Brno, Czech Republic.
Milan UríkDepartment of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Brno, Černopolní 9, 61300, Brno, Czech Republic. urik.milan@fnbrno.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2872-185X
Dagmar HošnováDepartment of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Brno, Černopolní 9, 61300, Brno, Czech Republic.
Vít KruntorádDepartment of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Brno, Černopolní 9, 61300, Brno, Czech Republic.
Michal BartošDepartment of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Brno, Černopolní 9, 61300, Brno, Czech Republic.
Oldřich MotykaNanotechnology Centre, CEET, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic.
Petr JabandžievFaculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Kamenice 5, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

Masarykova Univerzita MUNI/A/1118/2020Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000753Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky 65269705Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky FNBr
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study aimed to evaluate audiological benefits, quality of hearing and safety of two Bonebridge generation: BCI601 and BCI602 (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) in children.

methodsTwelve children were implanted: five BCI601 and seven BCI602 comprising of ten conductive hearing loss, and two single sided deaf SSD subjects. Audiological outcomes tested were sound field audiometry, functional gain, speech recognition threshold (SRT50), speech recognition in noise (SPRINT) and localisation abilities. Subjective measures were Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12).

resultsThe mean FG with the BCI601 was 25.0 dB and with the BCI602 28.0 dB. The benefit in SRT50 was 23.2 dB and 33.8 dB, respectively. The mean benefit in SPRINT was 15% and 6.7% and the localisation ability improved from 33.3° to 16° and from 26.2° to 17.6°, respectively. The two SSD subjects reported a FG of 17 dB, a benefit in SRT50 of 22.5 and a benefit in SPRINT of 20%. Subjective outcomes improved significantly and even exceeded the values of their age-and sex matched normal hearing peers. One revision was reported: a retroauricular emphysema above the implant occurred 12 months post-OP, it was resolved operatively with the implant still being functional.

conclusionThe pediatric cohort reports significant audiological benefit, even exceeding that of the age- and sex matched control. The combination of the high safety and audiological benefit makes the Bonebridge a comfortable and effective option in hearing rehabilitation in children.

Indexed as

Hearing AidsSpeech PerceptionBone ConductionChildHearingHearing Loss, ConductiveHearing TestsHumansTreatment OutcomeActive transcutaneous bone conduction implantAtresiaChildrenHearing outcomesLocalisationQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID34495351
PMCPMC9130159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.