Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34495337›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Association of COVID-19 Lockdown With the Tumor Burden in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Alain R Thierry, Brice Pastor, Ekaterina Pisareva, Francois Ghiringhelli, Olivier Bouché, Christelle De La Fouchardière, Julie Vanbockstael, Denis Smith, Eric François, Mélanie Dos Santos and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis and treatment of onco-hematologic patients: a discussion paper.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Alain R ThierryInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Brice PastorInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Ekaterina PisarevaInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Francois GhiringhelliCentre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Olivier BouchéHôpital Robert Debré, Reims, France.
Christelle De La FouchardièreCentre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Julie VanbockstaelInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, Saint-Herblain, France.
Denis SmithHôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.
Eric FrançoisCentre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Mélanie Dos SantosCentre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Damien BotsenMedical Oncology Department, Godinot Institute, Reims, France.
Stephen EllisCentre Catalan d'Oncologie, Perpignan, France.
Marianne FonckInstitut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Thierry AndréHȏpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.
Emmanuel GuardiolaCentre de Cancérologie du grand Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Faiza KhemissaCentre Hospitalier de Perpignan, Perpignan, France.
Benjamin LinotHôpital Privé du Confluent, Nantes, France.
J Martin-BabauCentre Cario, Plerin, France.
Yves RinaldiHôpital Européen de Marseille, Marseille, France.
Eric AssenatDepartment of Medical Oncology, St Eloi University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Lea ClavelHôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France.
Sophie DominguezHôpital Saint Vincent de Paul, Lille, France.
Celine GavoilleInstitue de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vadoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
David SefriouiCHU de Rouen, Rouen, France.
Veronica PezzellaUnicancer, Paris, France.
Caroline MolleviInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Marc YchouInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Thibault MazardInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Centre Hospitalier de Perpignan · FRInserm · FRInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FRCentre Antoine Lacassagne · FRCentre François Baclesse · FRCentre Georges François Leclerc · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRCentre Léon Bérard · FRHôpital Européen · FRHôpital privé du Confluent · FRHôpital Privé Jean Mermo · FRHôpital Saint-Vincent-de-Paul · FRInstitut Bergonié · FRInstitut de Cancérologie de Lorraine · FRInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FRInstitut Jean Godinot · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with substantial reduction in screening, case identification, and hospital referrals among patients with cancer. However, no study has quantitatively examined the implications of this correlation for cancer patient management. Objective: To evaluate the association of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown with the tumor burden of patients who were diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) before vs after lockdown. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed participants in the screening procedure of the PANIRINOX (Phase II Randomized Study Comparing FOLFIRINOX + Panitumumab vs FOLFOX + Panitumumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Stratified by RAS Status from Circulating DNA Analysis) phase 2 randomized clinical trial. These newly diagnosed patients received care at 1 of 18 different clinical centers in France and were recruited before or after the lockdown was enacted in France in the spring of 2020. Patients underwent a blood-sampling screening procedure to identify their RAS and BRAF tumor status. Exposures: mCRC. Main Outcomes and Measures: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis was used to identify RAS and BRAF status. Tumor burden was evaluated by the total plasma ctDNA concentration. The median ctDNA concentration was compared in patients who underwent screening before (November 11, 2019, to March 9, 2020) vs after (May 14 to September 3, 2020) lockdown and in patients who were included from the start of the PANIRINOX study. Results: A total of 80 patients were included, of whom 40 underwent screening before and 40 others underwent screening after the first COVID-19 lockdown in France. These patients included 48 men (60.0%) and 32 women (40.0%) and had a median (range) age of 62 (37-77) years. The median ctDNA concentration was statistically higher in patients who were newly diagnosed after lockdown compared with those who were diagnosed before lockdown (119.2 ng/mL vs 17.3 ng/mL; P < .001). Patients with mCRC and high ctDNA concentration had lower median survival compared with those with lower concentration (14.7 [95% CI, 8.8-18.0] months vs 20.0 [95% CI, 14.1-32.0] months). This finding points to the potential adverse consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and related lockdown. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that tumor burden differed between patients who received an mCRC diagnosis before vs after the first COVID-19 lockdown in France. The findings of this study suggest that CRC is a major area for intervention to minimize pandemic-associated delays in screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareTumor BurdenAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsCommunicable Disease ControlControlled Before-After StudiesCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID34495337
PMCPMC8427376
OpenAlexW3196608973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.