Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34495324›Full record

ReviewEmerging topics in life sciences2021

Mesenchymal stromal cells: what have we learned so far about their therapeutic potential and mechanisms of action?

Francesco Amadeo, Katherine Trivino Cepeda, James Littlewood, Bettina Wilm, Arthur Taylor, Patricia Murray

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emerging topics in life sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesco AmadeoDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Cell Signalling, Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, L69 3GE Liverpool, U.K.
Katherine Trivino CepedaDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Cell Signalling, Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, L69 3GE Liverpool, U.K.
James LittlewoodDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Cell Signalling, Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, L69 3GE Liverpool, U.K.
Bettina WilmDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Cell Signalling, Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, L69 3GE Liverpool, U.K.
Arthur TaylorDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Cell Signalling, Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, L69 3GE Liverpool, U.K.
Patricia MurrayDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Cell Signalling, Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, L69 3GE Liverpool, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-1316-148X
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been found to be safe and effective in a wide range of animal models of human disease. MSCs have been tested in thousands of clinical trials, but results show that while these cells appear to be safe, they tend to lack efficacy. This has raised questions about whether animal models are useful for predicting efficacy in patients. However, a problem with animal studies is that there is a lack of standardisation in the models and MSC therapy regimes used; there appears to be publication bias towards studies reporting positive outcomes; and the reproducibility of results from animal experiments tends not to be confirmed prior to clinical translation. A further problem is that while some progress has been made towards investigating the mechanisms of action (MoA) of MSCs, we still fail to understand how they work. To make progress, it is important to ensure that prior to clinical translation, the beneficial effects of MSCs in animal studies are real and can be repeated by independent research groups. We also need to understand the MoA of MSCs to assess whether their effects are likely to be beneficial across different species. In this review, we give an overview of the current clinical picture of MSC therapies and discuss what we have learned from animal studies. We also give a comprehensive update of what we know about the MoA of MSCs, particularly in relation to their role in immunomodulation.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsHumansImmunityImmunomodulationReproducibility of Resultsanimal modelsextracellular vesiclesmesenchymal stromal cellsMSC clinical trialsMSCs

Identifiers

PMID34495324
PMCPMC8589440
OpenAlexW3196765138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.