Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34495173›Full record

Trial reportJornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia2021

The impact of the stratification by degree of clinical severity and abandonment risk of tuberculosis treatment.

Pedro Daibert de Navarro, João Paulo Amaral Haddad, Juliana Veiga Costa Rabelo, Claudia Hermínia de Lima E Silva, Isabela Neves de Almeida, Wânia da Silva Carvalho, Silvana Spíndola de Miranda

Abstract readPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pedro Daibert de Navarro. Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, Prefeitura de Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-8672-9254
João Paulo Amaral Haddad. Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-2823-6288
Juliana Veiga Costa Rabelo. Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, Prefeitura de Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-7599-5565
Claudia Hermínia de Lima E Silva. Secretaria de Estado de Saúde de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-4983-9694
Isabela Neves de Almeida. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-6152-7648
Wânia da Silva Carvalho. Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-2575-6352
Silvana Spíndola de Miranda. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-7245-4472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvaluate the impact of the instrument of the "Stratification by Degree of Clinical Severity and Abandonment Risk of Tuberculosis Treatment" (SRTB) on the tuberculosis outcome.

methodsThis study was a pragmatic clinical trial involving patients with a confirmed diagnosis of tuberculosis treated at one of the 152 primary health care units in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil, between May of 2016 and April of 2017. Cluster areas for tuberculosis were identified, and the units and their respective patients were divided into intervention (use of SRTB) and nonintervention groups.

resultsThe total sample comprised 432 participants, 223 and 209 of whom being allocated to the nonintervention and intervention groups, respectively. The risk of treatment abandonment in the nonintervention group was significantly higher than was that in the intervention group (OR = 15.010; p < 0.001), regardless of the number of risk factors identified. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a hazard ratio of 0.0753 (p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe SRTB instrument was effective in reducing abandonment of tuberculosis treatment, regardless of the number of risk factors for that. This instrument is rapid and easy to use, and can be adapted to different realities. Its application showed characteristics predisposing to a non-adherence to the treatment and established bases to mitigate its impact.

Indexed as

TuberculosisBrazilCitiesHumansPrimary Health CareRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID34495173
PMCPMC8979663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.