Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34494964›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Severe Fatigue in Long COVID: Web-Based Quantitative Follow-up Study in Members of Online Long COVID Support Groups.

Maarten Van Herck, Yvonne M J Goërtz, Sarah Houben-Wilke, Felipe V C Machado, Roy Meys, Jeannet M Delbressine, Anouk W Vaes, Chris Burtin, Rein Posthuma, Frits M E Franssen and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Maarten Van Herck *REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, BIOMED Research Institute, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3333-6964
Yvonne M J Goërtz *Department of Research and Development, Ciro, Horn, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3453-7220
Sarah Houben-WilkeDepartment of Research and Development, Ciro, Horn, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6214-0365
Felipe V C MachadoDepartment of Research and Development, Ciro, Horn, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1910-7695
Roy MeysDepartment of Research and Development, Ciro, Horn, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4855-530X
Jeannet M DelbressineDepartment of Research and Development, Ciro, Horn, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5203-1592
Anouk W VaesDepartment of Research and Development, Ciro, Horn, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4136-1553
Chris BurtinREVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, BIOMED Research Institute, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1342-8554
Rein PosthumaDepartment of Research and Development, Ciro, Horn, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0015-0116
Frits M E FranssenDepartment of Research and Development, Ciro, Horn, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1633-6356
Bita HajianDepartment of Research and Development, Ciro, Horn, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0453-968X
Herman VijlbriefLung Foundation Netherlands, Amersfoort, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2676-5664
Yvonne SpiesLung Foundation Netherlands, Amersfoort, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5400-0327
Alex J van 't HulDepartment of Pulmonary Disease, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5514-2327
Daisy J A JanssenDepartment of Research and Development, Ciro, Horn, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1827-9869
Martijn A SpruitDepartment of Research and Development, Ciro, Horn, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3822-7430
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLCiro · NLLung Foundation Netherlands · NLHasselt University · BEMaastricht University · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFatigue is the most commonly reported symptom in patients with persistent complaints following COVID-19 (ie, long COVID). Longitudinal studies examining the intensity of fatigue and differentiating between physical and mental fatigue are lacking.

objectiveThe objectives of this study were to (1) assess the severity of fatigue over time in members of online long COVID peer support groups, and (2) assess whether members of these groups experienced mental fatigue, physical fatigue, or both.

methodsA 2-wave web-based follow-up study was conducted in members of online long COVID peer support groups with a confirmed diagnosis approximately 3 and 6 months after the onset of infectious symptoms. Demographics, COVID-19 diagnosis, received health care (from medical professionals or allied health care professionals), fatigue (Checklist Individual Strength-subscale subjective fatigue [CIS-Fatigue]; 8-56 points), and physical and mental fatigue (self-constructed questions; 3-21 points) were assessed. Higher scores indicated more severe fatigue. A CIS-Fatigue score ≥36 points was used to qualify patients as having severe fatigue.

resultsA total of 239 patients with polymerase chain reaction/computed tomography-confirmed COVID-19 completed the survey 10 weeks (SD 2) and 23 weeks (SD 2) after onset of infectious symptoms, respectively (T1 and T2). Of these 239 patients, 198 (82.8%) were women; 142 (59.4%) had no self-reported pre-existing comorbidities; 208 (87%) self-reported being in good health before contracting COVID-19; and 62 (25.9%) were hospitalized during acute infection. The median age was 50 years (IQR 39-56). The vast majority of patients had severe fatigue at T1 and T2 (n=204, 85.4%, and n=188, 78.7%, respectively). No significant differences were found in the prevalence of normal, mild, and severe fatigue between T1 and T2 (P=.12). The median CIS-Fatigue score was 48 points (IQR 42-53) at T1, and it decreased from T1 to T2 (median change: -2 points, IQR -7 to 3; P<.001). At T1, a median physical fatigue score of 19 points (IQR 16-20) and a median mental fatigue score of 15 points (IQR 10-17) were reported; these scores were lower at T2 for physical but not for mental fatigue (median change for physical fatigue -1 point, IQR -3 to 0, P<.001; median change for mental fatigue 0 points, IQR -3 to 3, P=.52). At the time of completing the follow-up survey, 194/239 (81.2%) and 164/239 (68.6%) of all patients had received care from at least one medical professional and one allied health care professional, respectively.

conclusionsFatigue in members of online long COVID support groups with a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis decreases from 10 to 23 weeks after onset of symptoms. Despite this, severe fatigue remains highly prevalent. Both physical and mental fatigue are present. It remains unclear whether and to what extent fatigue will resolve spontaneously in the longer term.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register NTR8705; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/8705.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInternetMiddle AgedPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSARS-CoV-2Self-Help GroupsCOVID-19fatiguelong COVIDmental healthonline healthonline supportpandemicpost-acute sequelae of COVID-19post-COVID-19 syndromepost-viral fatigueSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34494964
PMCPMC8457337
OpenAlexW3196652338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.