ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022
Effect of the postural transition in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe advantages of prone position in minimally invasive esophagectomy have not been well studied. This study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of a transition from the left lateral decubitus position to the prone position for thoracic procedures in minimally invasive esophagectomy.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with thoracic esophageal carcinomas who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy and laparoscopic gastric mobilization between January 2015 and December 2019. The left decubitus and prone positions were analyzed using propensity score-matched pairs for the baseline characteristics, morbidity, and survival.
resultsA total of 114 consecutive patients were included in this study; 90 (78.9%) were male and the median age was 67.2 years old. Of these patients, 39 and 75 underwent left decubitus and prone esophagectomy, respectively. Prone esophagectomy was associated with a lower incidence of pneumonia than that performed in the decubitus position (12.5% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.0187). With respect to the long-term outcomes, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. The 4-year overall and relapse-free survival rates for prone and decubitus esophagectomy were 73.8% and 73.2%, and 84.4% and 71.8%, respectively (p = 0.9899 and 0.6751, respectively). Prone esophagectomy yielded a shorter operative time (total: 528 [485-579] min vs. 581 [555-610] min, p < 0.0022; thoracic section: 243 [229-271] min vs. 292 [274-309] min, p < 0.0001), less bleeding in the thoracic procedures (0 [0-10] mL vs. 70 [20-138] mL, p < 0.0001), a shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (19 [15-23] vs. 30 [21-46] days, p = 0.0002), and a lower total hospital charge (30,046 [28,175-32,660] US dollars vs. 36,396 [31,533-41,180] US dollars, p < 0.0001).
conclusionsTransition into the prone position in minimally invasive esophagectomy is feasible with adequate postoperative and oncological safety and economical in esophageal cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34494153What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.