ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2023
Assessing chromatin relocalization in 3D using the patient rule induction method.
Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- STATISTICAL CURVE MODELS FOR INFERRING 3D CHROMATIN ARCHITECTURE.The annals of applied statistics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) genome architecture is critical for numerous cellular processes, including transcription, while certain conformation-driven structural alterations are frequently oncogenic. Inferring 3D chromatin configurations has been advanced by the emergence of chromatin conformation capture assays, notably Hi-C, and attendant 3D reconstruction algorithms. These have enhanced understanding of chromatin spatial organization and afforded numerous downstream biological insights. Until recently, comparisons of 3D reconstructions between conditions and/or cell types were limited to prescribed structural features. However, multiMDS, a pioneering approach developed by Rieber and Mahony (2019). that performs joint reconstruction and alignment, enables quantification of all locus-specific differences between paired Hi-C data sets. By subsequently mapping these differences to the linear (1D) genome the identification of relocalization regions is facilitated through the use of peak calling in conjunction with continuous wavelet transformation. Here, we seek to refine this approach by performing the search for significant relocalization regions in terms of the 3D structures themselves, thereby retaining the benefits of 3D reconstruction and avoiding limitations associated with the 1D perspective. The search for (extreme) relocalization regions is conducted using the patient rule induction method (PRIM). Considerations surrounding orienting structures with respect to compartmental and principal component axes are discussed, as are approaches to inference and reconstruction accuracy assessment. The illustration makes recourse to comparisons between four different cell types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.