Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34493979›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2021

Physicians' Attitude towards Electronic Medical Record Systems: An Input for Future Implementers.

Mulugeta Hayelom Kalayou, Berhanu Fikadie Endehabtu, Habtamu Alganeh Guadie, Zeleke Abebaw, Kassahun Dessie, Shekur Mohammed Awol, Nebyu Demeke Mengestie, Abraham Yeneneh, Binyam Tilahun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mulugeta Hayelom KalayouDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6080-7223
Berhanu Fikadie EndehabtuDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7117-6407
Habtamu Alganeh GuadieDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5711-5752
Zeleke AbebawDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2923-468X
Kassahun DessieDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7812-3743
Shekur Mohammed AwolDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0758-8743
Nebyu Demeke MengestieDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7210-9142
Abraham YenenehDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2739-8891
Binyam TilahunDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1813-167X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic medical record (EMR) systems offer the potential to improve health care quality by allowing physicians real-time access to patient healthcare information. The endorsement and usage of EMRs by physicians have a significant influence on other user groups in the healthcare system. As a result, the purpose of this study was to examine physicians' attitudes regarding EMRs and identify the elements that may influence their attitudes.

methodAn institutional-based cross-sectional study design supplemented with a qualitative study was conducted from March 1 to April 30, 2018, among a total of 403 physicians. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect quantitative data. The validity of the prediction bounds for the dependent variable and the validity of the confidence intervals and

resultPhysicians' computer literacy (CI: 0.264, 0.713;

conclusionAccording to the findings of this study, physicians' attitudes regarding EMR were found moderate in the studied region. There was a favorable relationship between computer ownership, computer literacy, lack of EMR experience, participation in EMR training, and attitude towards EMR. Improving the aforementioned elements is critical to improving physicians' attitudes regarding EMR.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelElectronic Health RecordsAdultComputer SystemsCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansMalePhysiciansSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34493979
PMCPMC8418928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.