Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34493937›Full record

ArticleUrban forestry & urban greening2021

Perceptions of Change in the Natural Environment produced by the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic across Three European countries. Results from the GreenCOVID study.

Marco Garrido-Cumbrera, Ronan Foley, Olta Braçe, José Correa-Fernández, Enrique López-Lara, Viveka Guzman, Alicia González Marín, Denise Hewlett

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urban forestry & urban greening, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. COVID-19 and the importance of urban green spaces.Urban forestry & urban greening · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marco Garrido-CumbreraHealth and Territory Research, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain.
Ronan FoleyDepartment of Geography, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.
Olta BraçeHealth and Territory Research, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain.
José Correa-FernándezHealth and Territory Research, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain.
Enrique López-LaraHealth and Territory Research, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain.
Viveka GuzmanDivision of Population Health, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Alicia González MarínHealth and Territory Research, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain.
Denise HewlettPeopleScapes Research Group, University of Winchester, United Kingdom.
Universidad de Sevilla · ESNational University of Ireland, Maynooth · IERoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEUniversity of Winchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although different studies have evaluated the positive impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures on reducing noise pollution and traffic levels and improving air quality, how populations have perceived such changes in the natural environment has not been adequately evaluated. The present study provides a more in-depth exploration of human population perception of enhanced natural exposure (to animal life and nature sounds) and reduced harmful exposure (by improved air quality and reduced traffic volume) as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. The data is drawn from 3,109 unselected adults who participated in the GreenCOVID survey from April to July 2020 in England, Ireland, and Spain. The findings suggest that the positive impacts to the natural environment as a result of the lockdown have been better received by the population in Spain and Ireland, in comparison to England. Participants who resided in urban areas had better perceived improvements in nature sounds, air quality, and traffic volume compared to those in rural areas. Older populations and those with lower smoking and alcohol consumption were found to perceive this improvement the most. Furthermore, the greater perception of improvements in environmental elements was also associated with better self-perceived health and improved wellbeing. In the binary logistic regression, living in Ireland or Spain, urban areas, female gender, older age, and good overall wellbeing were associated with a greater perception of improvements in the natural environment, while the factors most associated with a greater perception of reduced harmful exposure were living in Spain, had a good self-perceived health status and older age.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicEuropeNatural environmentPerceptionSoundscape

Identifiers

PMID34493937
PMCPMC8414052
OpenAlexW3184683883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.