Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34493770›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2021

Privacy-first health research with federated learning.

Adam Sadilek, Luyang Liu, Dung Nguyen, Methun Kamruzzaman, Stylianos Serghiou, Benjamin Rader, Alex Ingerman, Stefan Mellem, Peter Kairouz, Elaine O Nsoesie and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Adam SadilekGoogle, Mountain View, CA, USA. adsa@google.com.
Luyang LiuGoogle, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2704-4030
Dung NguyenBiocomplexity Institute, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Methun KamruzzamanBiocomplexity Institute, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8680-7061
Stylianos SerghiouGoogle, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2477-6060
Benjamin RaderComputational Epidemiology Lab, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Alex IngermanGoogle, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3155-4319
Stefan MellemGoogle, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6526-6913
Peter KairouzGoogle, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Elaine O NsoesieDepartment of Global Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9170-8714
Jamie MacFarlaneGoogle, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Anil VullikantiBiocomplexity Institute, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Madhav MaratheBiocomplexity Institute, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Paul EasthamGoogle, Mountain View, CA, USA.
John S BrownsteinComputational Epidemiology Lab, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Blaise Aguera Y ArcasGoogle, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Michael D HowellGoogle, Mountain View, CA, USA.
John HernandezGoogle, Mountain View, CA, USA. johnbhernandez@google.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3313-430X

Funding

Systems Analysis of Social Pathways of Epidemics to Reduce Health DisparitiesR01GM109718 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI MARATHE, ACHLA, VULLIKANTI, ANIL · 2014 to 2022
$3.6M
ACL HHS U01CK000589NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Privacy protection is paramount in conducting health research. However, studies often rely on data stored in a centralized repository, where analysis is done with full access to the sensitive underlying content. Recent advances in federated learning enable building complex machine-learned models that are trained in a distributed fashion. These techniques facilitate the calculation of research study endpoints such that private data never leaves a given device or healthcare system. We show-on a diverse set of single and multi-site health studies-that federated models can achieve similar accuracy, precision, and generalizability, and lead to the same interpretation as standard centralized statistical models while achieving considerably stronger privacy protections and without significantly raising computational costs. This work is the first to apply modern and general federated learning methods that explicitly incorporate differential privacy to clinical and epidemiological research-across a spectrum of units of federation, model architectures, complexity of learning tasks and diseases. As a result, it enables health research participants to remain in control of their data and still contribute to advancing science-aspects that used to be at odds with each other.

Identifiers

PMID34493770
PMCPMC8423792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.