Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34493730›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Functional comparison of MERS-coronavirus lineages reveals increased replicative fitness of the recombinant lineage 5.

Simon Schroeder, Christin Mache, Hannah Kleine-Weber, Victor M Corman, Doreen Muth, Anja Richter, Diana Fatykhova, Ziad A Memish, Megan L Stanifer, Steeve Boulant and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Recombination in Positive-Strand RNA Viruses.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Simon SchroederInstitute of Virology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christin MacheUnit 17, Influenza and other Respiratory Viruses, Robert Koch Institut, Berlin, Germany.
Hannah Kleine-WeberInfection Biology Unit, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germany.
Victor M CormanInstitute of Virology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3605-0136
Doreen MuthInstitute of Virology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Anja RichterInstitute of Virology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Diana FatykhovaDept. of Infectious and Respiratory Diseases, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Ziad A MemishResearch and Innovation Department, King Saud Medical City, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Megan L StaniferDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Virology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5606-1297
Steeve BoulantResearch Group "Cellular polarity and viral infection", German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Mitra GultomInstitute of Virology and Immunology (IVI), Bern, Switzerland.
Ronald DijkmanInstitute of Virology and Immunology (IVI), Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0320-2743
Stephan EggelingDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Vivantes Clinics Neukölln, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas HockeDept. of Infectious and Respiratory Diseases, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan HippenstielDept. of Infectious and Respiratory Diseases, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5146-1064
Volker ThielInstitute of Virology and Immunology (IVI), Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5783-0887
Stefan PöhlmannInfection Biology Unit, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6086-9136
Thorsten WolffUnit 17, Influenza and other Respiratory Viruses, Robert Koch Institut, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7688-236X
Marcel A MüllerInstitute of Virology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2242-5117
Christian DrostenInstitute of Virology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. christian.drosten@charite.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7923-0519
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEUniversity of Bern · CHGerman Center for Infection Research · DEGerman Primate Center · DERobert Koch Institute · DEAlfaisal University · SAGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DESechenov University · RUVivantes Klinikum · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 01KI1723A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is enzootic in dromedary camels across the Middle East and Africa. Virus-induced pneumonia in humans results from animal contact, with a potential for limited onward transmission. Phenotypic changes have been suspected after a novel recombinant clade (lineage 5) caused large nosocomial outbreaks in Saudi Arabia and South Korea in 2016. However, there has been no functional assessment. Here we perform a comprehensive in vitro and ex vivo comparison of viruses from parental and recombinant virus lineages (lineage 3, n = 7; lineage 4, n = 8; lineage 5, n = 9 viruses) from Saudi Arabia, isolated immediately before and after the shift toward lineage 5. Replication of lineage 5 viruses is significantly increased. Transcriptional profiling finds reduced induction of immune genes IFNB1, CCL5, and IFNL1 in lung cells infected with lineage 5 strains. Phenotypic differences may be determined by IFN antagonism based on experiments using IFN receptor knock out and signaling inhibition. Additionally, lineage 5 is more resilient against IFN pre-treatment of Calu-3 cells (ca. 10-fold difference in replication). This phenotypic change associated with lineage 5 has remained undiscovered by viral sequence surveillance, but may be a relevant indicator of pandemic potential.

Indexed as

AnimalsCamelusCells, CulturedCoronavirus InfectionsGenome, ViralHumansMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusPhylogenyRecombination, GeneticRepublic of KoreaSaudi ArabiaVirus Replication

Identifiers

PMID34493730
PMCPMC8423819
OpenAlexW3197197338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.