Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34493684›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Massive and rapid predominantly volcanic CO

Ying Cui, Mingsong Li, Elsbeth E van Soelen, Francien Peterse, Wolfram M Kürschner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
23.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The evolution of Gaia(s).Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Tracing energy inputs into the seafloor using carbonate sediments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Volcanic COScience advances · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Ying CuiDepartment of Earth and Environmental Studies, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043; w.m.kurschner@geo.uio.no cuiy@montclair.edu msli@pku.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-1057-4369
Mingsong LiSchool of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; w.m.kurschner@geo.uio.no cuiy@montclair.edu msli@pku.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-5542-8106
Elsbeth E van SoelenDepartment of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo 0371, Norway.
Francien PeterseDepartment of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8781-2826
Wolfram M KürschnerDepartment of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo 0371, Norway; w.m.kurschner@geo.uio.no cuiy@montclair.edu msli@pku.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-6883-6486
University of Oslo · NOMontclair State University · USPeking University · CNUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The end-Permian mass extinction event (∼252 Mya) is associated with one of the largest global carbon cycle perturbations in the Phanerozoic and is thought to be triggered by the Siberian Traps volcanism. Sizable carbon isotope excursions (CIEs) have been found at numerous sites around the world, suggesting massive quantities of

Indexed as

CO2compound specific carbon isotopesEarth system modelend-Permian mass extinction

Identifiers

PMID34493684
PMCPMC8449420
OpenAlexW3196343409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.